🇮🇪Ireland
16°C Partly Cloudy · Dublin
Live Updates
--:--:-- IST
Contributor sign in
Latest
Clinical Trials in Germany / NCT03935750
Active, not recruiting Not applicable

STABILITY 2: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction +/- Lateral Tenodesis With Patellar vs Quad Tendon

NCT03935750 · tracked via the Priya Life Science Germany tracker
Phase
Not applicable
Started
2020-07-28
Last updated
2026-06-17

Condition(s) studied

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuryAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionJoint Instability

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR)Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET)

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR): All participants will undergo an anatomic ACLR with either a BPTB or QT autograft, as randomized.

Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET): Participants randomized to the BPTB or QT arms will be randomized a second time to a LET procedure or no additional surgery.

Study summary

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is one of the most common musculoskeletal injuries in young individuals, particularly those that are active in sports. Up to 30% of individuals under the age of 20 years suffer a re-injury to the reconstructed ACL. Revision ACLR has been associated with degeneration of the articular cartilage and increased rates of meniscal tears, increasing the risk of post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA), additional surgical procedures, reduced physical function and quality of life. As such, strategies to reduce ACLR failure, particularly in young active individuals, are critical to improving short and long-term outcomes after ACL rupture.

There is ongoing debate about the optimal graft choice and reconstructive technique. Three autograft options are commonly used, including the bone-patellar-tendon-bone (BPTB), quadriceps tendon (QT) and hamstring tendon (HT). Additionally, a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) may provide greater stability to the ACLR; however, its effect on failure rate is unclear and surgery-induced lateral compartment OA is a concern.

To definitively inform the choice of autograft and the need for a LET, this multicenter, international randomized clinical trial will randomly assign 1292 young, active patients at high risk of re-injury to undergo ACLR using BPTB or QT autograft with our without LET.

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Min age
14 Years
Max age
25 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion Criteria: * Age 14-25, * An ACL-deficient knee, * Skeletal maturity (i.e. closed epiphyseal growth plates on standard knee radiographs), * At least two of the following: participate in a competitive pivoting sport; have a pivot shift of grade 2 or greater; have generalized ligamentous laxity (Beighton score of ≥4) and/or genu recurvatum \>10 degrees. Exclusion Criteria: * Previous ACLR on either knee, * Partial ACL injury (defined as one bundle ACL tear requiring reconstruction/augmentation of the torn bundle with no surgery required for the intact bundle), * Multiple ligament injury (two or more ligaments requiring surgery), * Symptomatic articular cartilage defect requiring treatment other than debridement, * \>3 degrees of asymmetric varus, * Inflammatory arthropathy, * Inability to provide consent, * Pregnancy at baseline.

Primary outcome measure(s)

Trial sites (31)

FacilityCityRegionStatus
Stanford University Redwood City California
University of California, San Francisco San Francisco California
Orlando Health Jewett Orthopedic Institute Orlando Florida
Med Center Health Bowling Green Kentucky
University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky
Ochsner Clinic Foundation Baton Rouge Louisiana
University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan
University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota
Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota
University of New Mexico Albuquerque New Mexico
Hospital for Special Surgery New York New York
Wake Forest University School of Medicine Winston-Salem North Carolina
University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
The Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia
Banff Sport Medicine Clinic Banff Alberta
University of Calgary Sport Medicine Centre Calgary Alberta
Fraser Health Authority New Westminster British Columbia
Pan Am Clinic Winnipeg Manitoba
Nova Scotia Health Authority Halifax Nova Scotia
McMaster University Hamilton Ontario
Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic London Ontario
University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario
St. Michael's Hospital Toronto Ontario
Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
Cologne-Merheim Medical Center, Klinik für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Sporttraumatologie Cologne Germany
University Klinik Münster Münster Germany
Dublin City University / UPMC Sports Surgery Clinic Dublin Dublin 9
Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
Stockholm South Hospital, Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
North Bristol Trust Bristol United Kingdom
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust Coventry United Kingdom

Other trials for the same condition

Official registry record

This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.

View NCT03935750 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Germany