WiSE System: The WiSE System is an implantable cardiac system to provide LV pacing stimulation in conjunction with a co-implanted system that provides right ventricular stimulation.
Study summary
This study is a prospective, multi-center, pivotal trial to study the safety and efficacy of the WiSE-CRT System for Cardiac Re-synchronization Therapy.
Eligibility
Sex
ALL
Min age
18 Years
Max age
—
Healthy volunteers
Accepted
Inclusion/Exclusion:
Inclusion Criteria
1. Patient with a class I or IIa (1) or (2) indication for implantation of a CRT-D device according to current available guidelines (with additional QRS criteria on Class IIa (1)):
1. Class I: NYHA II, III, IV, EF ≤ 35%, LBBB, QRS ≥ 150ms
2. Class IIa (1): NYHA II, III, IV, EF≤ 35%, LBBB, QRS ≥ 130 to \< 150ms
3. Class IIa (2): NYHA II, III, IV, EF≤ 35%, non-LBBB, QRS ≥ 150ms
2. Patient is a:
1. 'Non-responder' \[Not Enrolling\]: Patients who have a CRT system that is functional and despite an adequate trial of Guideline Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) and attempts at optimal device programming the patient has not responded to therapy for a minimum of 6 months. Non-response is defined as:
* EF has remained unchanged or worsened (defined as \< 5% increase since implant), and
* The patient's clinical status based in the totality of available clinical evidence (such as NYHA Class, exercise tolerance, QOL, or global assessment) has remained unchanged or worsened, as determined by the local Site Enrollment Committee
OR
2. 'Previously Untreatable': Patients who have a full or partial CRT system, who meet general inclusion criteria and are deemed as 'previously untreatable' for one of the following reasons:
i. Patients in whom CS lead implantation for CRT has failed
* CS lead implant was attempted but abandoned due any of the following: difficult CS access or anatomy, inadequate lead location, inadequate pacing thresholds, persistent phrenic nerve pacing, or other procedural challenges
ii. CS lead implanted but has been programmed OFF
* LV lead that was implanted but not operational includes patients in whom the LV lead is inoperative or programmed off due to improper function such as high threshold, non-capture, phrenic nerve pacing, lead failure, lead dislodgement, or sub-optimal LV lead location
OR
c. 'High Risk Upgrade:
Patients who have a relative contraindication to CS lead implant, due to:
* venous occlusion or lesion precluding implant
* pocket infection risk (at co-implanted device site)
* considered high risk for CS implant due to co-morbidities
3. Patients on a stable Guideline Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT)
4. Patient must be 18 years old or over
5. Patient has signed and dated informed consent
6. Patient has suitable anatomy for implant of the WiSE CRT System (e.g. adequate acoustic window, LV wall thickness in target implant area ≥ 5 mm, absence of LV wall structural abnormalities which may preclude implant)
Exclusion Criteria
Patients who meet any one of these criteria will be excluded from the investigation:
1. Pure RBBB
2. LVEDD ≥ 8cm
3. Non-ambulatory or unstable NYHA class IV
4. Contraindication to heparin, chronic anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents
5. Triple anticoagulant patients who cannot tolerate peri-procedural stopping of anticoagulation therapy
6. Attempted device implant (pacemaker, ICD, CRT, LV lead) or successful co-implant within prior 30 days.
7. Patients with planned or expected lithotripsy treatment post implant
8. Life expectancy of \< 12 months
9. Chronic hemodialysis
10. Stage 4 or 5 renal dysfunction defined as eGFR \< 30
11. Grade 4 mitral valve regurgitation
12. Noncardiac implanted electrical stimulation therapy devices
13. Patients with a prosthetic aortic valve in which the electrode cannot be implanted via a transseptal approach
14. Patients with a prosthetic mitral valve in which the electrode cannot be implanted via a retrograde aortic approach
15. Unstable angina, acute MI, CABG, or PTCA within the past 1 month
16. Correctable valvular disease that is the primary cause of heart failure
17. Recent CVA or TIA (within the previous 3 months)
18. Patients with a history of paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation/flutter are excluded if they have had a documented AF episode \> 30 min or a cardioversion in the past 1 month.
19. Patients with permanent AF are excluded if they have intact AV node conduction (RV pacing \<95%)
20. Already included in another clinical study that could confound the results of this study
21. Pregnancy
22. Known drug or alcohol addiction or abuse
23. Moderate or severe aortic stenosis
24. Subject unable to attend follow-up at the investigative center or unable, for physical or mental reasons, or to comply with the trial's procedures
25. For Part II Randomized patients only, those who will not tolerate being randomized to the Control Group for 6 months
Primary outcome measure(s)
Primary Safety — 6 Months Freedom from Procedure and Device System related Type 1 Complications
Primary Efficacy 1 — 6 Months Mean relative % change in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV) baseline to 6 Months.
Trial sites (68)
Facility
City
Region
Status
Heart Center Research
Huntsville
Alabama
University of California, San Diego
La Jolla
California
Broward Health Medical Center
Fort Lauderdale
Florida
St. Vincent's Healthcare
Jacksonville
Florida
Watson Clinic
Lakeland
Florida
Naples Community Hospital
Naples
Florida
Northside Hospital and Heart Institute
St. Petersburg
Florida
Piedmont Heart Institute
Atlanta
Georgia
Emory Healthcare
Atlanta
Georgia
Prairie Heart
Springfield
Illinois
St. Vincent's Hospital and Healthcare Center
Indianapolis
Indiana
University of Iowa
Iowa City
Iowa
Saint Luke's Health System Kansas City
Kansas City
Kansas
The University of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City
Kansas
Baptist Health Lexington
Lexington
Kentucky
Ochsner Medical Center - Baton Rouge
Baton Rouge
Louisiana
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor
Michigan
Michigan Heart
Canton
Michigan
Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit
Michigan
William Beaumont Hospital
Hazel Park
Michigan
Sparrow Hospital
Lansing
Michigan
Minneapolis Heart Institute
Minneapolis
Minnesota
Mayo Clinic
Rochester
Minnesota
United Heart and Vascular Clinic
Saint Paul
Minnesota
Methodist Physicians Clinic Heart Consultants
Omaha
Nebraska
Rutgers University
New Brunswick
New Jersey
AtlantiCare Regional Medical Center
Pomona
New Jersey
Weill Cornell Medical Center
New York
New York
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland
Ohio
The Ohio State University
Columbus
Ohio
PeaceHealth
Springfield
Oregon
Penn State Health, Hershey Medical Center
Hershey
Pennsylvania
UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute
Pittsburgh
Pennsylvania
MUSC Gazes Research Institute
Charleston
South Carolina
Stern Cardiovascular Center
Germantown
Tennessee
Texas Heart Institute
Houston
Texas
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Houston
Texas
The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano
Plano
Texas
Houston Methodist
Sugar Land
Texas
Intermountain Medical Center
Murray
Utah
+ 28 more sites — see the full list on the official registry below.
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
We use cookies to analyse site traffic and improve your experience. With your consent, we may also use cookies for advertising. You can change your choice at any time.