🇮🇪Ireland
16°C Partly Cloudy · Dublin
Live Updates
--:--:-- IST
Contributor sign in
Latest
Clinical Trials in Canada / NCT07600333
Starting soon Not applicable

CPAP vs High-Flow Nasal Cannula for Treating Sleep Apnea in Children

NCT07600333 · tracked via the Priya Life Science Canada tracker
Phase
Not applicable
Started
2026-06-01
Last updated
2026-05-20

Condition(s) studied

Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

High Flow Nasal CannulaContinuous Positive Airway Pressure

High Flow Nasal Cannula: High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) therapy delivers warmed, humidified air at high flow rates through soft nasal prongs during sleep to support upper airway patency in children with obstructive sleep apnea. The therapy is used nightly at home, with flow settings optimized according to standard clinical care and overnight sleep study titration.

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) therapy delivers pressurized air through a nasal or oronasal mask worn during sleep to maintain upper airway patency and treat obstructive sleep apnea. CPAP therapy is used nightly at home, with pressure settings optimized according to standard clinical care and overnight sleep study titration.

Study summary

This study is looking at two different treatments for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children. OSA is a sleep condition where breathing repeatedly stops and starts during sleep, which can affect a child's health, behavior, learning, and quality of life.

Children with moderate-to-severe OSA who cannot be treated with surgery are often prescribed Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP). CPAP uses a mask worn during sleep to deliver pressurized air and keep the airway open. Although CPAP is effective, many children have difficulty using it regularly because it can feel uncomfortable or hard to tolerate.

This study compares CPAP with another treatment called High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC). HFNC delivers warm, humidified air through soft nasal prongs and may be more comfortable and easier for children to use while still helping keep the airway open during sleep.

Children aged 2 to 18 years with moderate-to-severe OSA will be randomly assigned to use either CPAP or HFNC at home during sleep for 3 months. The study will measure how much each treatment is used, how well it improves sleep-related symptoms and quality of life, how comfortable it is for children, and how it affects caregivers.

The goal of this study is to find out whether HFNC is a comfortable and effective alternative to CPAP for treating obstructive sleep apnea in children.

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Min age
2 Years
Max age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion Criteria: * Aged 2 to 18 years * Diagnosed with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea, defined as an obstructive apnea-hypopnea index (OAHI) ≥5 events/hour, confirmed by an in-laboratory polysomnography within the previous 6 months * Deemed to require Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) therapy as part of usual clinical care * Ability of the participant and/or parent or legal guardian to provide informed consent (and assent when applicable) Exclusion Criteria: * Predominant or pathological central sleep apnea (central apnea-hypopnea index ≥5 events/hour) * Chronic respiratory failure or medical conditions requiring ventilatory support with a set respiratory rate (e.g., neuromuscular disease requiring bilevel ventilation with a backup rate) * Hypoventilation requiring non-invasive ventilation with a set respiratory rate * History of pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum * Uncontrolled gastroesophageal reflux and/or recurrent vomiting * Uncontrolled oral secretions * Prior use of CPAP or High-Flow Nasal Cannula therapy for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea within the previous 12 months

Primary outcome measure(s)

Trial sites (1)

FacilityCityRegionStatus
The Hospital for Sick Children Toronto Ontario

More The Hospital for Sick Children trials in Canada

Other trials for the same condition

Official registry record

This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.

View NCT07600333 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Canada