🇮🇪Ireland
16°C Partly Cloudy · Dublin
Live Updates
--:--:-- IST
Contributor sign in
Latest
Clinical Trials in Canada / NCT06634264
Recruiting Not applicable

Comparison of Two Reeducation Methods in Children With Persistent Sleep Apnea, a Randomized Controlled Trial

NCT06634264 · tracked via the Priya Life Science Canada tracker
Phase
Not applicable
Started
2024-03-20
Last updated
2024-10-09

Condition(s) studied

Obstructive Sleep Apnea of ChildSleep-Disordered BreathingAdenotonsillar Hypertrophy

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

Soft Oral Appliance

Soft Oral Appliance: Ora-Motor training of oral muscles (tongue, lips) associated with nasal hygiene, with reduced parental support.

Study summary

Myofunctional therapy has been shown to be effectively reduce symptoms of paediatric obstructive sleep apnea, usually performed after adenotonsillectomy.

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Passive Oral Myofunctional Reeducation (using a flexible oral appliance) compared to nasal hygiene alone (control group), in a population of children scheduled for adenotonsillectomy.

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Min age
4 Years
Max age
14 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion Criteria: participants must: * present signs of obstructive sleep apnea: snoring, apnea / respiratory pauses audible by the entourage (objectivized by a score, to the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) , greater than or equal to 0.33- This questionnaire comprises twenty-two Questions and has a good sensitivity (83%) and specificity (87%) in screening for pediatric sleep apnea. * be programmed for adenoidectomy, tonsillectomy or adeno-tonsillectomy within 3 months (or more). Exclusion Criteria: participants should not: * present with a craniofacial syndrome nor a severe medical condition with complex medical management, * present with an abnormality of the neuromuscular tone (such as Duchenne myopathy or cerebral palsy) * receive orthodontic therapy during the study * have a class III malocclusion (mandibular prognathy type), for which a propulsion oral appliance is contraindicated because it may aggravate mandibular prominence. Maxillary deficiency is not a exclusion criterion. * A non-nutritive oral habit such as digital sucking (or pacifier) that persists because it interferes with oral reeducation and is a contraindication to orthodontic treatments. Children who have recently stopped such a habit may be included in the study.

Primary outcome measure(s)

Trial sites (1)

FacilityCityRegionStatus
CHU Sainte Justine, Université de Montréal Montreal Quebec Recruiting

More Université de Montréal trials in Canada

Other trials for the same condition

Official registry record

This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.

View NCT06634264 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Canada