Adaptive radiotherapy +/- margin reduction: Radiotherapy using adaptive technology to recontour and re-plan daily as required. Reductions in the PTV margin will also be introduced in the second phase of this study.
Image guided radiotherapy: Standard radiation treatment used in the department of radiation oncology for cancer in pelvic area
Study summary
Pelvis Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) is a two phase study looking at using adaptive radiotherapy to help reduce toxicity for cancer patients having radiotherapy in the pelvic region.
Adaptive radiotherapy is a new technology that provides the ability to account for daily changes in anatomy. Adaptive radiotherapy also provides a foundation for which radiotherapy margins might be safely reduced.
Phase 1 of this study is looking to see if a radiation therapist centred adaptive workflow can be implemented. If phase 1 of this study is safe and feasible, the study will proceed to phase 2. Phase 2 of the study looks at using adaptive technology to reduce radiation treatment margins. The primary aim of this study is to see whether margin reduced treatment using adaptive radiotherapy can reduce side effects for patients with cancer in the pelvic area.
Eligibility
Sex
ALL
Min age
18 Years
Max age
—
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Age \> 18
2. ECOG performance status 0-2
3. Patients receiving curative or adjuvant pelvic radiation including:
1. Prostate cancer where nodal treatment is required
2. Prostate cancer post prostatectomy
3. Bladder cancer
4. Rectal cancer
5. Anal cancer
6. Adjuvant radiotherapy for gynaecological cancers
7. Pelvic Lymph nodes only
4. Ability to understand and the willingness to sign an informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
* Hip prosthesis
* Patient separation from approximate radiation centre to skin edge \> 24cm, measured on diagnostic scan
Primary outcome measure(s)
Dose coverage of Clinical Target Volume (CTV) (% of CTV receiving 95% of prescribed dose) will be performed between the two arms (Safety). — 12 months The CTV dose coverage must be equal or better in 90% of fractions for 90% of patients in the adaptive arm will be compared with the virtual image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) fraction. Dose coverage will be calculated as the percent of CTV receiving at least 95% of the prescribed dose (TD). Percentage will be measured from 0-100%, a higher % is a better outcome.
The percentage of organ at risk (OAR) dose volume histogram (DVH) metrics satisfying departmental protocol constraints will be compared for each patient between the two arms (Safety). — 12 months The OAR DVH dose constraints must be equal or better in 90% of fractions for 90% of patients compared with the virtual image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) fraction (safety). Percentage will be measured from 0-100%, a higher % is a better outcome.
The percentage of successfully delivered fractions on the adaptive arm will be measured (feasibility). — 12 months At least 90% of patients must have 90% of planned adaptive treatments successfully delivered in phase 1 of the study. Percentage will be measured from 0-100%, a higher % is a better outcome.
Acute patient reported toxicity — Within 90 days of patients completing treatment The study will measure the difference in patient reported combined maximum genitourinGU and GI toxicity (Grade 2 or higher) as per PRO-CTCAE between the two treatment arms. PRO-CTCAE scale is generally measured from 0 to 5, higher scale being a worse outcome.
Trial sites (1)
Facility
City
Region
Status
Northern Sydney Local Health District
St Leonards
New South Wales
Recruiting
More Royal North Shore Hospital trials in Australia
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
We use cookies to analyse site traffic and improve your experience. With your consent, we may also use cookies for advertising. You can change your choice at any time.