A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Two Combinations of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH) Mutant Targeted Therapies Plus Azacitidine in Participants With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Harboring IDH Mutations Who Are Not Candidates to Receive Intensive Induction Chemotherapy
1. to determine the recommended combination dose of AG-120 and AG-221 separately when administered with azacitidine and,
2. to investigate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the combinations of AG-120 with azacitidine and AG-221 with azacitidine versus with azacitidine alone in participants with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) enzyme isoforms 1 or 2 mutations, respectively.
Eligibility
Sex
ALL
Min age
18 Years
Max age
—
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion Criteria:
* Newly diagnosed, primary (ie, de novo) or secondary (progression of Myelodysplastic syndrome \[MDS\] or myeloproliferative neoplasms \[MPN\], or therapy-related) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) according to the WHO classification with ≥ 20% leukemic blasts in the bone marrow
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1 or 2
* Agree to serial bone marrow aspirate/biopsies
Exclusion Criteria:
* Suspected or proven to have acute promyelocytic leukemia based on morphology, immunophenotype, molecular assay, or karyotype
* AML secondary to chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML)
* Received a targeted agent against an isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) or isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) mutation
* Has or is suspected of having central nervous system (CNS) leukemia. Evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid is only required if CNS involvement by leukemia is suspected during screening
Other protocol defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply
Primary outcome measure(s)
The Number of Participants Experiencing Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs): Phase 1B (Dose Finding Stage) — From first dose to 28 days after first dose Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) are defined as an event that constitute a change from baseline irrespective of outcome and determined by the investigator to be related to treatment. The DLT-evaluable participants were defined as participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug in the Phase 1b Dose-Finding Stage and either had a DLT during Cycle 1 (regardless of amount of study drug exposure), or had no DLT and completed at least 75% of AG-120 or AG-221 doses (21 out of 28 days) and a minimum of 5 doses of AZA, at least 50% of the planned combination doses for AG-120 or AG-221 and AZA administered together (in the same day for 4 out of 7 days) in the first 28 days from C1D1, and were also considered by the Clinical Study Team to have sufficient safety data available to conclude that a DLT did not occur during Cycle 1.
The Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events: Phase 1B (Dose Finding and Expansion Stage) — From first dose to 28 days after last dose (up to approximately 13 months) The number of participants experiencing different types of adverse events (AE). An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of a study. A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any AE occurring at any dose that: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, and/or constitutes an important medical event. Adverse events were analyzed in terms of treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) was defined as events that began on or after the start of study drug through 28 days after the last study treatment. The severity/intensity of AEs were graded based upon the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.03) where Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Life-threatening, and Grade 5 = Death.
Overall Response Rate: Phase 2 (Randomized Stage) — From first dose up to approximately 26 months The percent of participants with MLFS + CR + CRi + CRp + PR according to modified International Working Group Acute Myeloid Leukemia (IWG AML) response criteria as assessed by investigator. Complete response (CR) and morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS) are defined as \<5% blasts in a BM aspirate sample with marrow spicules and a count of ≥200 nucleated cells. There should be no blasts with Auer rods and no extramedullary disease. CR must also include: absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1,000/μL, Platelet count ≥100,000/μL, and independent of red cell transfusions for ≥1 week before each response assessment. Complete remission with incomplete neutrophil recovery (CRi) is all criteria of CR except ANC. Complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) is all criteria of CR except platelet count. Partial remission (PR) is defined as all hematologic criteria of CR with a \>50% decrease in the percentage of BM blasts to 5% to 25%. (\<5% considered if Auer rods are present).
Trial sites (49)
Facility
City
Region
Status
Local Institution - 105
Duarte
California
Local Institution - 107
New Haven
Connecticut
Local Institution - 108
Chicago
Illinois
Local Institution - 103
Chicago
Illinois
Local Institution - 102
Boston
Massachusetts
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston
Massachusetts
Local Institution - 902
Boston
Massachusetts
Local Institution - 106
New York
New York
Local Institution - 110
Dallas
Texas
Local Institution - 178
Adelaide
South Australia
Local Institution - 175
Melbourne
Australia
Local Institution - 177
Perth
Australia
Local Institution - UNK-121
Yvoir
Belgium
Local Institution - 125
Toronto
Ontario
Local Institution - 205
Lille
France
Local Institution - 206
Marseille
France
Local Institution - 200
Paris
France
Local Institution - 204
Pessac
France
Local Institution - 202
Pierre-Bénite
France
Local Institution - 203
Toulouse
France
Local Institution - 201
Villejuif
France
Local Institution - 227
Berlin
Germany
Local Institution - 230
Dresden
Germany
Local Institution - 225
Ulm
Germany
Local Institution - 253
Bologna, Emilia-Romagna
Italy
Local Institution - 252
Florence
Italy
Local Institution - 256
Genova
Italy
Local Institution - 251
Orbassano
Italy
Local Institution - 254
Padova
Italy
Local Institution - 250
Pesaro
Italy
Local Institution - 255
Roma
Italy
Local Institution - 277
Utrecht
Netherlands
Local Institution - 327
Lisbon
Portugal
Local Institution - 351
Seoul
South Korea
Local Institution - 350
Seoul
South Korea
Local Institution - 379
Barcelona
Spain
Local Institution - 375
Barcelona
Spain
Local Institution - 376
Cáceres
Spain
Local Institution - 378
Madrid
Spain
Local Institution - 381
Madrid
Spain
+ 9 more sites — see the full list on the official registry below.
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
We use cookies to analyse site traffic and improve your experience. With your consent, we may also use cookies for advertising. You can change your choice at any time on our Cookie Policy page. See also our Privacy Policy.