Flow-Controlled vs. Pressure-Controlled Ventilation in CABG: Effects on Lung Aeration and Diaphragm Function

Condition(s) studied

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

Flow-Controlled Ventilation: FCV delivers tidal ventilation via a continuous triangular flow waveform, maintaining constant inspiratory and expiratory flow rates throughout the entire respiratory cycle. PEEP and peak airway pressure are titrated independently, guided by dynamic respiratory system compliance. Tidal volume target is 6-8 mL/kg ideal body weight. This ventilation modality is distinct from pressure-controlled and volume-controlled modes, which generate decelerating inspiratory flow profiles and do not allow simultaneous independent titration of PEEP and peak airway pressure based on compliance.

Pressure-Controlled Ventilation (PCV): PCV is delivered using a standard anaesthesia workstation in pressure-controlled mode. Inspiratory pressure is set to achieve a tidal volume of 6-8 mL/kg ideal body weight. PEEP is titrated using the same compliance-guided algorithm applied in the FCV arm. Unlike FCV, the inspiratory flow profile is decelerating and PEEP and peak airway pressure are not independently optimised in a compliance-guided manner within the same ventilation mode

Study summary

Pulmonary atelectasis and loss of lung aeration are common complications following cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and are associated with impaired oxygenation and prolonged mechanical ventilation. Diaphragm dysfunction occurring in the perioperative period may further delay extubation and prolong intensive care unit (ICU) stay. Flow-Controlled Ventilation (FCV) is a novel ventilation modality that provides continuous, flow-based delivery of tidal breaths with a triangular flow profile, potentially offering superior dynamic compliance optimisation compared to conventional Pressure-Controlled Ventilation (PCV).

Eligibility

Primary outcome measure(s)

• Total Lung Ultrasound Score (LUS) — Preoperatively (T0), within 30 minutes of sternal closure while intubated (T1), and 24 hours postoperatively after extubation (T2)
  Lung aeration assessed using a 12-zone bilateral ultrasonography protocol. Each zone scored 0-3 (0 = normal aeration with A-lines; 1 = multiple B-lines; 2 = coalescent B-lines; 3 = consolidation). Total score ranges from 0 to 36; higher scores indicate greater aeration loss

Trial sites (1)

More Koşuyolu Kartal Heart Training and Research Hospital trials in Turkey

Other trials for the same condition