🇮🇪Ireland
16°C Partly Cloudy · Dublin
Live Updates
--:--:-- IST
Contributor sign in
Latest
Clinical Trials in Turkey / NCT07789795
Recruiting Not applicable

Hemodynamic Effects of Bilateral and Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia Using the Continuous Pressure Recording Analytical Method.

NCT07789795 · tracked via the Priya Life Science Turkey tracker
Phase
Not applicable
Started
2026-05-01
Last updated
2026-08-27

Condition(s) studied

Spinal AnesthesiaHemodynamic Changes

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

Unilateral Spinal AnesthesiaBilateral Spinal Anesthesia

Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia: Unilateral spinal anesthesia administered for unilateral lower extremity surgery.

Bilateral Spinal Anesthesia: Bilateral spinal anesthesia administered for unilateral lower extremity surgery.

Study summary

This randomized controlled study aims to compare the intraoperative hemodynamic effects of unilateral and bilateral spinal anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty. Seventy-four patients aged 65 years and older will be randomized into two groups: unilateral spinal anesthesia (n=37) and bilateral spinal anesthesia (n=37).

Hemodynamic parameters including cardiac output, stroke volume, stroke volume variation, pulse pressure variation, and systemic vascular resistance will be continuously monitored using the Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM)-based MostCare monitoring system. Intraoperative fluid requirements and vasopressor consumption will also be evaluated.

The study seeks to determine whether unilateral spinal anesthesia provides greater hemodynamic stability and reduces the need for fluid administration and vasopressor support compared with conventional bilateral spinal anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing hip arthroplasty.

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Min age
65 Years
Max age
—
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Adults aged 65 years and older. 2. Patients scheduled for elective total hip arthroplasty. 3. Patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of II, III, or IV. 4. Patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 13-15 who are conscious and able to cooperate. 5. Patients with suitable peripheral arterial anatomy for PRAM monitoring. 6. Patients who provide written informed consent to participate in the study. 7. Patients without any clinical contraindication to spinal anesthesia. - Exclusion Criteria: 1. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score \<13. 2. Age below 65 years. 3. History of previous major neurosurgical intervention. 4. Anatomical abnormality, vascular defect, or infection at the site intended for arterial catheter placement for PRAM monitoring. 5. Severe spinal deformity (e.g., severe scoliosis, previous spinal fusion surgery, or spinal trauma). 6. Current anticoagulant therapy or coagulopathy (INR \>1.5 or platelet count \<75,000/mm³). 7. Presence of skin infection or systemic infection/sepsis. 8. Severe hypovolemia or decompensated cardiac disease in which spinal anesthesia is contraindicated. 9. Known allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthetics or sedative agents. 10. Local infection or wound at the planned spinal puncture site. 11. Clinical contraindication to spinal anesthesia (e.g., increased intracranial pressure, septicemia, or severe hypotension). -

Primary outcome measure(s)

Trial sites (1)

FacilityCityRegionStatus
Kayseri City Hospital Kayseri Kayseri Recruiting

More Kayseri City Hospital trials in Turkey

Other trials for the same condition

Official registry record

This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.

View NCT07789795 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Turkey