Experimental AI Case Group: Students in the experimental group will be presented with a case scenario and given 30 minutes to review it. During this time, they will be asked to develop a care plan for the case. Subsequently, within a 60-minute session, the researcher will present a care plan prepared with artificial intelligence assistance for the same case. A case discussion will then be conducted by comparing the care plans developed by the students with the AI-assisted care plan.
Study summary
This study aimed to examine the effect of artificial intelligence-assisted case discussions on midwifery students' use and proficiency of artificial intelligence technologies and their clinical competency levels. With the rapid development of artificial intelligence, its integration into healthcare education has become increasingly important. Supporting case-based learning with AI tools may enhance students' clinical decision-making, problem-solving, and critical thinking skills. Therefore, this study evaluates the contribution of AI-assisted educational approaches to the professional development of midwifery students.
Eligibility
Sex
FEMALE
Min age
—
Max age
—
Healthy volunteers
Accepted
Inclusion Criteria:
* Being a 3rd/4th year student in the Midwifery department
* Having previously taken courses on Healthy and High-Risk Pregnancy
* Having prepared and presented at least one midwifery care plan
Exclusion Criteria:
* Using more than 20% absenteeism in field applications
Primary outcome measure(s)
Level of artificial intelligence usage — Through study completion, an average of 3 months Changes in the level of AI usage among midwifery students after training, compared to baseline values. The Student Attitudes toward Artificial Intelligence Scale (SATAI), developed in 2025, will be used for measurement.The scale, developed using a five-point Likert scale (1=Strongly disagree and 5=Strongly agree), does not contain any reverse-coded items. The highest possible score on the scale is 130, and the lowest is 26, with higher scores reflecting more positive attitudes towards artificial intelligence.
Usage and proficiency level — Through study completion, an average of 3 months This will be measured using the Generative Artificial Intelligence Use and Proficiency (GAAP) Scale, developed in 2024. Planned as a five-point Likert scale (fully reflecting = 5 points - not reflecting = 1 point), an increase in the score obtained from this scale indicates a high level of artificial intelligence use and proficiency. The minimum possible score on the scale is 19, and the maximum is 95.
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
We use cookies to analyse site traffic and improve your experience. With your consent, we may also use cookies for advertising. You can change your choice at any time.