The Effect of Wound Care Education Given to Patients on Wound Care Knowledge, Self-Care Self-Efficacy, and Quality of Recovery

Condition(s) studied

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

artificial intelligence-supported education: The purpose of the study will be explained to the individuals in the experimental group using a face-to-face interview technique, and a patient introduction form will be administered by the researcher one day before surgery. The researcher will then provide patients with visual and verbal wound care training using the "Surgical Patient Wound Care Guide," and the educational materials will be provided. To assess the effectiveness of the training, a Knowledge Level Survey consisting of 10 true/false questions will be administered to patients on the third postoperative day. Two weeks after surgery, the Patient Follow-up Form, Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale, and Quality of Healing Scale will be completed by phone.

Study summary

This study will be conducted as a randomized controlled trial to determine the impact of artificial intelligence-assisted wound care training provided to patients undergoing prosthetic surgery on their wound care knowledge, quality of healing, and self-care self-efficacy. It was planned to include 22 individuals in the experimental group and 22 in the control group. However, considering the potential for data loss, the study was planned to be completed with a total of 50 individuals: 25 in the experimental group and 25 in the control group. Patient Identification Form, Patient Follow-up Form, Knowledge Level Questionnaire, Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale and Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) Scale were used to collect data.

Eligibility

Primary outcome measure(s)

• Knowledge Level — postoperative day 3
  The researcher-created knowledge survey includes 10 true/false questions aimed at measuring the effectiveness of Surgical Patient Wound Care Education provided to patients. Each question will be evaluated out of 10. The lowest possible score is 0, and the highest is 100. Higher scores indicate higher knowledge levels. Expert opinions will be obtained from three faculty members with expertise in the field to assess the adequacy of the survey's content and scope.
• Self-Care Self-Efficacy — 15th day after surgery
  The scale originally developed by Yu et al. to determine individuals' self-care self-efficacy levels was modified by Chica-Pérez et al. to assess self-care self-efficacy in older adults with chronic multimorbidity. The scale was designed as a 5-point Likert-type instrument ranging from "1 = I do not trust myself" to "5 = I trust myself a lot." It consists of 10 items in total. In their study, Chica-Pérez et al. reported Cronbach's alpha coefficients as 0.713 for the subscale "Self-Efficacy in Clinical Knowledge-Based Self-Care Behaviors," 0.822 for "Self-Efficacy in Self-Care," 0.881 for "Self-Efficacy in Monitoring Self-Care," and 0.878 for "Self-Efficacy in Self-Care Management." Chica-Pérez et al. stated that the minimum possible score is 10 and the maximum is 50, with higher scores indicating higher levels of self-efficacy in self-care.
• Quality of Recovery — 15th day after surgery
  The Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) is a brief postoperative recovery scale developed and validated by Stark et al. in 2013. It is a shortened version of the QoR-40 scale. It is easier to use because it is shorter and can be completed in a shorter time. Like the QoR-40, it contains 15 questions that assess the patient's pain, physical comfort, physical independence, psychological support, and emotional state. The test results in a score between 0 and 150, with a higher score indicating better recovery quality. With the latest update, the minimal clinically important difference, that is, the lowest difference indicating a meaningful change, is 6 for the QoR-15.

Trial sites (2)

More TC Erciyes University trials in Turkey

Other trials for the same condition