This qualitative study aims to explore the experiences of midwifery students in preparing educational materials as part of the "Normal Birth and Postpartum Period" course at Antalya Bilim University. The study will evaluate both the students' perspectives on the preparation process and the educational materials they developed. The research is designed to support the development of professional skills by engaging students in the creation of tangible learning tools such as models and visual materials.
Eligibility
Sex
FEMALE
Min age
17 Years
Max age
—
Healthy volunteers
Accepted
Inclusion Criteria:
* 3rd-year midwifery students
* Enrolled in the "Normal Birth and Postpartum Period" course
* Voluntary participation and informed consent
* Completion of material preparation task
Exclusion Criteria:
* Withdrawal from the course or failure to attend data collection sessions
* Incomplete or substandard educational material submission
Primary outcome measure(s)
Themes identified in students' responses during semi-structured interviews on the impact of educational material preparation on professional knowledge and skills — January 2025 (end of the course) Qualitative data will be collected via semi-structured interviews conducted with 15-20 midwifery students at the end of the course. Thematic analysis will be performed to identify recurring themes related to knowledge acquisition, skill development, motivation, problem-solving, and integration of theory into practice. Interviews will be audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded by at least two independent researchers to ensure reliability.
Scores assigned to educational materials prepared by students, based on expert rubric assessing scientific accuracy, usability, visual quality, and clinical applicability — December 2024 - January 2025 (evaluation phase) Five faculty experts with doctoral-level qualifications will evaluate each student-created educational material using a standardized scoring rubric with 7 criteria. Each criterion will be scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = poor, 5 = excellent). Total score range: 7-35. Higher scores indicate better quality and relevance. Inter-rater reliability will be assessed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). The materials will be anonymized and scored independently.
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
We use cookies to analyse site traffic and improve your experience. With your consent, we may also use cookies for advertising. You can change your choice at any time.