Mechanical thrombectomy: Mechanical thrombectomy with stent retriever
Study summary
To compare safety and effectiveness of NeVa Stent Retriever (SR) to Control SR in the treatment of stroke caused by large vessel occlusion. The main questions it aims to answer are:
How do recanalization rates for NeVa SR compare with those of the Control SR? How does NeVa SR safety compare with Control SR safety?
Eligibility
Sex
ALL
Min age
18 Years
Max age
—
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion Criteria:
* Treatment during the enrollment period
* Age ≥18
* Baseline modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score ≤ 1
* Pre-stroke modified Rankin score (mRS) of 0 or 1
* Internal Carotid Artery (ICA), Middle Cerebral Artery (first segment M1/ second segment M2), basilar artery or vertebral artery occlusion
* National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≥ 8 and ≤ 25
* Thrombectomy procedure initiated within 8h of Time Last Known Well (TLKW)
* Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator (IV-tPA) failed, given within 3h of TLKW, or ineligibility for thrombolytic drug
Exclusion Criteria:
* First line contact aspiration alone or non-study device as first-line device
Primary outcome measure(s)
Reperfusion Effectiveness — Procedural Number of patients with a Modified Thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) ≥2B and mTICI≥2C recanalization after 1st pass and at end of procedure
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
We use cookies to analyse site traffic and improve your experience. With your consent, we may also use cookies for advertising. You can change your choice at any time.