🇮🇪Ireland
16°C Partly Cloudy · Dublin
Live Updates
--:--:-- IST
Contributor sign in
Latest
Clinical Trials in Turkey / NCT06950918
Recruiting Not applicable

Flipped Classroom vs. Flip-Jigsaw in Theoretical Physiotherapy Education

NCT06950918 · tracked via the Priya Life Science Turkey tracker
Sponsor
Isparta University of Applied Sciences
Phase
Not applicable
Started
2025-05-10
Last updated
2026-03-31

Condition(s) studied

Physiotherapy and RehabilitationEducational TechnologyEducational InterventionsStudentsUndergraduate Health Professional Students

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

Experimental

Experimental: This study is a quasi-experimental parallel group design comparing Flipped Classroom (FC) and Flip-Jigsaw models in a theoretically-oriented public health course. Both groups used the same pre-prepared video lectures to standardize content, but differentiated in-class strategies: The FC group used instructor-led discussions, while the Flip-Jigsaw group used Jigsaw technique and peer teaching (students learning subtopics in "expert groups" and teaching them in "master groups"). Unlike traditional FC, this hybrid model includes systematic peer collaboration and role-based accountability mechanisms. Theoretical knowledge acquisition, motivation and engagement outcomes were assessed through quantitative tests (pre-post-retention tests) and qualitative interviews, and objectivity was ensured in practical exams with single-blinded assessors. The study brings innovation to the literature as it is the first study to demonstrate the unique effect of Flip-Jigsaw in theoretical courses in the fie

Study summary

Study Summary:

This quasi-experimental pre-test-post-test study aims to compare the effects of Flipped Classroom (FC) and Flip-Jigsaw instructional models on theoretical knowledge acquisition, academic motivation, and class engagement among 86 third-year physiotherapy undergraduates enrolled in a theory-based public health course.

Primary Questions:

How does the hybrid Flip-Jigsaw model impact learning and motivation outcomes compared to FC alone?

Do FC and Flip-Jigsaw differ in enhancing theoretical knowledge, motivation, and participation?

Comparison: Researchers will compare the FC group (pre-class videos + in-class discussions) with the Flip-Jigsaw group (video-based pre-learning + structured peer teaching) to evaluate differences in outcomes.

Participant Tasks:

Attend lectures and complete pre-/post-knowledge tests.

Engage in practical sessions (FC: group discussions; Flip-Jigsaw: peer-led jigsaw activities).

Complete motivation surveys and participation assessments.

Significance: Addresses the gap in understanding Flip-Jigsaw's efficacy in physiotherapy education, despite prior reports on FC and Jigsaw's individual benefits.

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Min age
18 Years
Max age
25 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted
Inclusion Criteria: * To be between the ages of 18-25 * Volunteering to participate in the study * Taking the course for the first time * Having access to the Internet * Compulsory course attendance Exclusion Criteria: * Being a minor student * Not being the first undergraduate education * To have previously attended courses, seminars, webinars, etc. related to public health * Participation in other pedagogical studies during the same academic term. * Failure to complete ≥1 assessment (pre-test, post-test, or surveys).

Primary outcome measure(s)

Trial sites (1)

FacilityCityRegionStatus
Süleyman Demirel University Isparta Turkey (Türkiye) Recruiting

Other trials for the same condition

Official registry record

This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.

View NCT06950918 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Turkey