The aims of this observational study are to evaluate the trueness of two different digital occlusal analyzers; handheld occlusal analyzer versus intraoral scanner in comparison to conventional methods in identifying true occlusal contacts and to evaluate inter-examiner reliability of two examiners independently analyzing occlusal contacts.
Eligibility
Sex
ALL
Min age
18 Years
Max age
—
Healthy volunteers
Accepted
Inclusion Criteria:
* Normal occlusion (Angle Class 1)
* No missing teeth
* No tempromandibular disorders
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients having:
* Dental prostheses
* Extensive restorations
* Severe malocclusion
* Periodontal disease
* Excessive tooth wear
* Orofacial pain
* Temporomandibular joint disorders
* Anterior or posterior open bite
* Active orthodontic treatment.
Primary outcome measure(s)
Evaluation of trueness — 4 months Trueness is defined as the closeness of the measurement to the real size of an object. The trueness of handheld occlusal analyzers (occlusense) versus intraoral scanners (medit occlusal analyzer) will be evaluated in comparison to conventional methods (8 um articulating paper).
Trial sites (1)
Facility
City
Region
Status
Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
We use cookies to analyse site traffic and improve your experience. With your consent, we may also use cookies for advertising. You can change your choice at any time.