Guided Versus Non-Guided Harvesting Technique of Soft Tissue Graft in Cairo Recession Type I Sites

NCT06603467 · tracked via the Priya Life Science Egypt tracker

Sponsor

Tanta University

Phase

Not applicable

Started

2024-04-15

Last updated

2024-09-19

Condition(s) studied

Gingival Recessions

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

non-guided de-epithelialized free gingival graft harvestedguided de-epithelialized free gingival graft harvested

non-guided de-epithelialized free gingival graft harvested: gingival recession will be covered with de-epithelialized free gingival graft harvested without guide

guided de-epithelialized free gingival graft harvested: gingival recession will be covered with de-epithelialized free gingival graft harvested with digital guide

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the healing pattern in the palate following harvesting of deepithelialized free gingival graft by two different harvesting techniques and to compare the recession coverage at the recipient sites.

. The main questions it aims to answer are:

• Does the harvesting technique will affect the healing pattern \&the recipient site coverage in the treatment of gingival recession?

Participants will:

* Receive in the recession sites, in group 1 deepithelialized free gingival graft harvested without guide \& group 2: will be covered with graft harvested with guide
* Visit the clinic twenty-four hours after surgery and weekly visits for 1 month, early wound healing at the sites of harvesting will be assessed
* The recession coverage will be assessed at 3\& 6 months after surgery

Eligibility

Sex

ALL

Min age

20 Years

Max age

—

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: * Gingival recession sited classifies as Cairo type I * must have a general health showing no contraindications for oral surgery, * must be at least 20 years old. * patients also had to have good oral hygiene before the treatment Exclusion Criteria: * signs or symptoms of bruxism or clenching i * patients suffering from uncontrolled systemic conditions * smoker * pregnant or lactating

Primary outcome measure(s)

Early Wound Healing Score (EHS) EHS — 6 month
Early Wound Healing Score (EHS) EHS. This score assessed clinical signs of re-epithelialization (CSR), clinical signs of hemostasis (CSH), and clinical signs of inflammation (CSI). Since complete wound epithelialization was the main outcome, the CSR score was weighted to be 60% of the total final score. Accordingly, a score of 0, 3, or 6 points was possible for the assessment of CSR, whereas scores of 0, 1, or 2 points were possible for CSH and CSI. Higher values indicated better healing. Accordingly, the score for ideal early wound healing was 10

Trial sites (1)

Facility	City	Region	Status
Faculty of Dentistry,Tanta university	Tanta	Tanta

More Tanta University trials in Egypt

Metformin as Added on Therapy in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Recruiting

Vonoprazan vs Proton Pump Inhibitor With Vitamin D or Probiotics Based Triple Therapy for Eradication of Helicobacter Pylori Infection Recruiting

The Effect of Preoperative Administration of Oral Tizanidine on the Postoperative Pain and Sleep Quality Recruiting

Patient and Operator Centered Outcomes Concerning Connective Tissue Graft Should Be Considered to Choose Adequately Which Protocol to Use Active, not recruiting

Effect of Synbiotic as an Adjuvant Therapy in the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease Recruiting

Other trials for the same condition

Management of Postoperative Pain Following Free Gingival Graft Harvesting Using Ora-Aid Versus Acrylic Palatal Stent Recruiting

Official registry record

This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.

View NCT06603467 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Egypt