Picoprep: 200 patients will be randomised to this arm
Plenvu: 200 patients will be randomised to this arm
Study summary
The trial is about comparing the efficacy of Plenvu with Picoprep. Both are bowel cleansing agents prior to visual examination of the large bowel to exclude cancer disease.
400 patients who are referred for colonoscopy to a single center in North Jutland will be randomised either to Picoprep or Plenvu. These patients will then answer a questionnaire prior to colonoscopy. The questionnaire is about the most common expected side effects and the experience of cleansing og intake of the bowel agents.
The effect of the two agents will examined using a special scoring system (Harefield) to determine the quality of bowel cleansing. Colonoscopist who evaluate the cleansing is blinded to which agent the patient has taken.
Eligibility
Sex
ALL
Min age
18 Years
Max age
—
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion Criteria:
* Ambulant colonoscopy
* Older than18
Exclusion Criteria:
* Younger than 18
* Known with severe heart failure
* Known with severe renal failure (eGFR\<30)
* Known for colonic stenosis
* Pregnant or breastfeeding
* Acute colonoscopy
* Cancer screening program colonoscopy
* Mentally retarded
* Redo colonoscopy of patients included in this study and colonoscopy was canceled because of bad bowel preparation.
* Patients with Phenylketonuria
* Patients with Glucose-6-phosphate-dehydrogenase deficiency
* Patients with colon or rectum resection
Primary outcome measure(s)
Efficacy of cleansing agent — 18 hours The primary endpoint is the efficacy of cleansing preparations measured by the quality of cleansing. This is done using the validated Harefield Cleansing Scale.
The cleansing quality is measured after dividing the colon into 5 segments (Rectum, sigmoid colon, Descending colon, Transverse colon, and Ascending colon/Cecum) and each segment is scored from 0 (irremovable heavy hard stool), 1 (Semi-solid, only partially removable stools), 2 (Brown liquid/removable semi-solid stools) 3 (Clear liquid), and 4 (empty and clean), then a total grade is given. Grade A (all segments scored 3 or 4) and B (one or more segments scored 2) are considered as successful cleansing. Grade C (one or more segments scored 1) and D (one or more segments scored 0) is considered unsuccessful cleansing.
Trial sites (1)
Facility
City
Region
Status
Aalborg University hospital
Aalborg
North Jutland
Recruiting
More Aalborg University Hospital trials in Denmark
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
We use cookies to analyse site traffic and improve your experience. With your consent, we may also use cookies for advertising. You can change your choice at any time.