Can a Single-session Intervention Decrease Risk for Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults? A Preliminary Investigation of Feasibility and Acceptability
Single Session for Overevaluation: A single session informed by the principles of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy-Enhanced and motivational intervening.
Study summary
This project has two primary aims: 1) to develop a single session intervention to understand different forms of self-evaluation with input from young adults, and 2) to examine whether a single session can improve the ways in which young adults measure their self-importance with a session led by a trained masters-level therapist. Eligible participants will complete a baseline questionnaire, a therapeutic session online, and follow-up questionnaires.
Eligibility
Sex
ALL
Min age
18 Years
Max age
25 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted
Inclusion Criteria:
* between 18-25 years of age
* English speaking
* Demonstrate elevated overevaluation of weight, shape or muscularity
Exclusion Criteria:
* Have or have had in the past an eating disorder
* Is receiving treatment for an eating disorder
Primary outcome measure(s)
Shape and Weight Based Self-Esteem Inventory (SAWBS) — From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 4-weeks Pie graph between 0-100. Higher scores indicate greater overevaluation of shape, weight or muscularity.
Eating Disorder-15 (ED-15) — From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 4-weeks The ED-15 is comprised of 15 questions and uses a 7-point rating scale (0 - 6) for each item, with higher scores suggesting a greater likelihood or presence of eating disorder symptoms.
Eating Disorder Examination - Questionnaire (EDE-Q) — From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 4-weeks The EDE-Q is comprised of 28 questions and uses a 7-point rating scale (0-6) for each item, with higher scores reflecting greater ED symptoms.
Program Feedback Scale (PFS) — Immediately after the intervention The PFS is a 9-item questionnaire which was developed to examine acceptability of SSI's. Items one through seven are rated on a 5-point Likert-type scales ranging from 0 (really disagree) to 4 (really agree). Higher scores indicate greater acceptability of the single session. The remaining two items are open-ended questions (e.g., "What did you like about the program?") which allow for participants to provide detailed feedback.
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
We use cookies to analyse site traffic and improve your experience. With your consent, we may also use cookies for advertising. You can change your choice at any time.