Is Adaptive SBRT for Prostate vs Image-guided Radiotherapy a True Evolution (ASPIRE)

Condition(s) studied

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

SBRT: Standard of care SBRT (36.25 Gy in 5 fractions or 42.7 Gy in 7 fractions) for localized prostate cancer, delivered either via an adaptive or a non-adaptive image-guided treatment. Androgen deprivation therapy use and duration is at the discretion of the treating physician and patient, in accordance with standard practice based on patients' prostate cancer risk group.

Study summary

The ASPIRE study is a Phase III randomized, single-center study designed to evaluate whether adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) offers superior clinical benefits compared to standard image-guided SBRT for patients with localized prostate cancer. It aims to explore whether adaptive SBRT can improve urinary outcomes while maintaining effective cancer control.

This interventional study is randomized, single-institution, and includes 320 participants with localized prostate cancer. Patients will be stratified based on fractionation schedules (5 vs. 7 fractions), use of rectal spacers, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), and baseline alpha receptor antagonist use. Participants will be randomized to receive either adaptive SBRT or standard image-guided SBRT, with both arms adhering to established dosing protocols.

Inclusion criteria includes an age greater than 18 years, diagnosed with localized prostate adenocarcinoma, and an ECOG performance status of 0-1, Eligible for prostate SBRT. The exclusion criteria includes patients who plan for elective nodal irradiation and contraindications to radiotherapy or MRI (for MR-Linac patients).

Eligibility

Primary outcome measure(s)

• To determine whether adaptive SBRT can significantly reduce the proportion of patients experiencing a minimal clinically important difference in patient reported urinary domain changes when compared to the non adaptive image guided SBRT group. — Within 3 months following radiation therapy
  To determine whether adaptive SBRT can significantly reduce the proportion of patients experiencing a minimal clinically important difference (MCID; defined as \>10-point change) in patient reported urinary domain changes by EPIC-26 (The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite) questionnaire. within 3-months following radiation when compared to the non-adaptive image guided SBRT group

Trial sites (1)

More University Health Network, Toronto trials in Canada

Other trials for the same condition