🇮🇪Ireland
16°C Partly Cloudy · Dublin
Live Updates
--:--:-- IST
Contributor sign in
Latest
Clinical Trials in Canada / NCT06569199
Starting soon Not applicable

Pediatric Femur Fractures: Functional Bracing vs Spica Casting - Outcomes and Cost Analysis

NCT06569199 · tracked via the Priya Life Science Canada tracker
Phase
Not applicable
Started
2024-10-01
Last updated
2024-08-28

Condition(s) studied

Pediatric Femur Fracture

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

Functional BracingHip Spica Cast

Functional Bracing: Premade fabricated braces in three sizes (small, medium and large) that have been designed for the pediatric age group between 0-5 years old will be stocked at the Alberta Children's Hospital. Braces will be applied to participants in the emergency department. As these braces are designed to allow for positional adjustments, if deemed necessary adjustments will be made by the attending orthopaedic surgeon at subsequent follow-up visit(s).

Hip Spica Cast: The current standard of care for diaphyseal pediatric hip fractures in children aged 6 months to 5 years old is hip spica casting. A hip spica is a hard cast that covers a child's body from the chest down to their knees or ankles allowing for fracture immobilization to promote healing. Application of the spica cast occurs in the operating room and requires a general anaesthetic. Caring for a child in a hip spica cast presents significant challenges for caregivers due to the cast's cumbersome size and restricted mobility which makes routine caregiver activities like daily hygiene, toileting, transportation and skin surveillance difficult. Inadequate maintenance of the spica cast may result in skin complications, necessitating extra visits for cast adjustments, or potentially requiring revision casting in the operating room.

Study summary

Pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures that occur in children aged 6 months to 5 years old are traditionally treated with hip spica casting. However, recent studies suggest that functional bracing may offer clinical and financial benefits, yet there's a lack of prospective trials comparing these two treatment methods. This single-center randomized-control trial aims to assess subjective and objective clinical outcomes as well as financial aspects of functional bracing versus spica casting. Functional bracing, proposed as a potentially superior alternative, may address caregiver challenges and reduce costs by avoiding operating room time and hospital admissions. The study will evaluate fracture reduction, time to union, functional outcomes, and caregiver satisfaction. Additionally, a comprehensive cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted. Ultimately, this research aims to inform clinical decision-making regarding the optimal management of pediatric femur fractures, considering both clinical effectiveness and economic implications.

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Min age
6 Months
Max age
5 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients aged 6mo-5 years * Isolated closed diaphyseal femur fracture * Parent or caregiver 18 years of age or older who are cognitively able to complete the parent/caregiver satisfaction survey. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients \<6 months or \>5 years of age * Underlying neuromuscular disorders * Open diaphyseal femur fracture * Polytrauma * Medical comorbidities impacting fracture healing * \<6 week follow-up

Primary outcome measure(s)

Trial sites (1)

FacilityCityRegionStatus
Alberta Children's Hospital Calgary Alberta

More University of Calgary trials in Canada

Official registry record

This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.

View NCT06569199 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Canada