Panther: A Study Comparing Biweekly and Tailored EC-T Versus Three Weekly FEC-T in Breast Cancer Patients

Condition(s) studied

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

dtEC→dtT: Individually tailored and two weekly dosed epirubicin (start dose 90mg/m2) + cyclophosphamide (start dose 600mg/m2) followed by a three weeks break followed by biweekly and tailored docetaxel (start dose 75mg/m2) given every second week. If toxicity measured by CTC-NCI criteria are grade 2 or less (except haematological toxicity) it will be possible to escalate doses

FEC→T: Fixed dosed and three weekly epirubicin (100mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (500mg/m2) and 5-fluorouracil (500mg/m2), followed by fixed dosed and three weekly docetaxel (100mg/m2), no dose escalations.

Study summary

This is an adjuvant, open, prospective, randomized study to compare:

A. Individually tailored and two weekly dosed epirubicin + cyclophosphamide followed by a three weeks break followed by biweekly and tailored docetaxel (dtEC→dtT) given every second week, to

B. Fixed dosed and three weekly epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil, followed by fixed dosed and three weekly docetaxel (FEC→T).

Patients with primary node-positive or high risk lymph node negative breast cancer will be eligible for the study.

The primary objective of the phase 3 study is to compare breast cancer relapse-free survival (BCRFS) between the dtEC→dtT and FE100C→T. To detect a five-year BCRFS difference of 0.710 to 0.790 about 1000 patients per arm will be needed. They will be recruited during four years and followed another two years for breast cancer events.

Secondary objectives are to compare

1. Distant disease-free survival (DDFS)
2. Event-free survival and
3. Overall survival
4. Health-related quality of life and toxicity analyses according to CTC
5. Outcome in relation to tumour biological factors and polymorphism patterns

1. RFS in relation to the Sorlie classes using immunohistochemical markers and/or gene expression profiling comparing A vs B arm
2. RFS with receptor positive disease (analyzed in the local laboratories as described in the CRFs and also analyzed as continuous variables) in the comparison between the A- and B- arms.
3. RFS with high and low proliferation, respectively, (analyzed in the local laboratories as described in the CRFs and also analyzed as a continuous variable, or centrally analyzed), in the comparison between the A- and B-arms.
4. RFS in relation to HER-2/neu status (analyzed in the local laboratories as described in the CRFs) in the primary cancers in the comparison between the A- and B-arms and analyzed whether trastuzumab was given in sequence or concurrently.
5. RFS analyzed in relation to other molecular markers (e.g. gene expression profiling/ sequencing) in the primary cancers and SNPs signatures in normal DNA (related to toxicities for EC/FEC and docetaxel components, respectively, and given dose levels and outcome in relation to these factors and in relation QoL) to outcome per arm.
6. RFS analyzed in relation to tumour associated lymphocytes and Y-box binding protein in the comparison between the A- and B-arms.

Tumour tissue will be obtained and stored for studies of prognostication and therapy prediction.

Last patient randomized was September 2011.

Eligibility

Primary outcome measure(s)

• Breast cancer relapse-free survival — 2 years
  Breast cancer recurrence free survival is defined as time from randomization to the first of the events; local-, regional- or distant breast cancer recurrence or death due to breast cancer or last date of follow-up if no event has occurred. This was defined already in the phase 2 protocol (1 Sept 2004).

Trial sites (80)

+ 40 more sites — see the full list on the official registry below.

Other trials for the same condition