A Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Deucravacitinib Compared With Placebo in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Who Are Naïve to Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs or Had Previously Received TNFα Inhibitor Treatment
Condition(s) studied
Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)
Deucravacitinib: Specified dose on specified days
Placebo: Specified dose on specified days
Apremilast: Specified dose on specified days
Study summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of deucravacitinib versus placebo for the treatment of participants with active PsA who are naïve to biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs or had previously received TNFα inhibitor treatment.The long term extension period will provide additional long-term safety and efficacy information.
Eligibility
Primary outcome measure(s)
- Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 at Week 16 — Week 16
The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 is defined as 20% improvement over baseline in tender (68) and swollen (66) joint counts and a 20% improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core data set measures: Participant Global Assessment of Disease Activity; Participant Global Assessment of Pain; Participant assessment of physical function; Physician Global Assessment of psoriatic arthritis; and Acute phase reactant value of high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). Baseline is defined as the last measurement on or prior to date/time of first dose of study treatment.
Trial sites (138)
| Facility | City | Region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Local Institution - 0149 | Mountain Brook | Alabama | |
| Local Institution - 0212 | Sacramento | California | |
| Local Institution - 0188 | Whittier | California | |
| Local Institution - 0192 | Skokie | Illinois | |
| Local Institution - 0203 | Hopkinsville | Kentucky | |
| Local Institution - 0195 | Baton Rouge | Louisiana | |
| Local Institution - 0169 | Cumberland | Maryland | |
| Local Institution - 0034 | Okemos | Michigan | |
| Local Institution - 0133 | Eagan | Minnesota | |
| Local Institution - 0109 | Hattiesburg | Mississippi | |
| Local Institution - 0108 | New York | New York | |
| Local Institution - 0186 | Rochester | New York | |
| Local Institution - 0196 | Charlotte | North Carolina | |
| Local Institution - 0180 | Cleveland | Ohio | |
| Local Institution - 0189 | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | |
| Local Institution - 0147 | Portland | Oregon | |
| Local Institution - 0016 | Duncansville | Pennsylvania | |
| Local Institution - 0182 | Summerville | South Carolina | |
| Local Institution - 0167 | Lubbock | Texas | |
| Local Institution - 0070 | Mesquite | Texas | |
| Local Institution - 0184 | Plano | Texas | |
| Local Institution - 0187 | Seattle | Washington | |
| Local Institution - 0190 | Franklin | Wisconsin | |
| Local Institution - 0175 | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | |
| Local Institution - 0048 | La Plata | Buenos Aires | |
| Local Institution - 0038 | San Isidro | Buenos Aires | |
| Local Institution - 0039 | CABA | Distrito Federal | |
| Local Institution - 0171 | San Miguel de Tucumán | Tucumán Province | |
| Local Institution - 0200 | Buenos Aires | Argentina | |
| Local Institution - 0003 | Botany | New South Wales | |
| Local Institution - 0018 | Parramatta | New South Wales | |
| Local Institution - 0004 | Maroochydore | Queensland | |
| Local Institution - 0099 | Woodville | South Australia | |
| Local Institution - 0002 | Camberwell | Victoria | |
| Local Institution - 0017 | Geelong | Victoria | |
| Local Institution - 0078 | Brussels | Belgium | |
| Local Institution - 0058 | Ghent | Belgium | |
| Local Institution - 0061 | Liège | Belgium | |
| Local Institution - 0111 | Vancouver | British Columbia | |
| Local Institution - 0006 | Hamilton | Ontario |
+ 98 more sites — see the full list on the official registry below.
On this site
📄 Otezla (apremilast) drug profile →More Bristol-Myers Squibb trials in the UK
Other trials for the same condition
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
View NCT04908189 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in the UK