Efficacy and Safety of Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Removal of 4-10 mm Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
Condition(s) studied
Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)
cold snare polypectomy: Cold snare polypectomy was conducted for the removal of 4-10 mm pedunculated colorectal polyps.
hot snare polypectomy: Hot snare polypectomy was conducted for the removal of 4-10 mm pedunculated colorectal polyps.
Study summary
This was a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial designed to compare the efficacy and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy for the removal of 4-10 mm pedunculated colorectal polyps. The primary outcome was delayed postpolypectomy bleeding. The secondary outcomes included immediate postpolypectomy bleeding, procedure time, en bloc resection, complete histologic resection, use of haemostatic clips and perforation rate.
Eligibility
Primary outcome measure(s)
- delayed postoperative bleeding — interviewed by telephone on days 2 and 14 after polypectomy
bleeding that developed within 2 weeks after the patient left the endoscopy unit
Trial sites (1)
| Facility | City | Region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qilu Hospital of Shandong University | Jinan | Shandong |
More Shandong University trials in China
Other trials for the same condition
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
View NCT06937047 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in China