Computer-Assisted Microwave Liver Ablation: Computer-assisted image-processing software used intraoperatively to assist in percutaneous thermal ablation. The software performs segmentation and registration of pre-procedural and intraprocedural imaging, and simulates the expected ablation zone based on probe position, applied energy, and adjacent vascular structures. The output is displayed in 3D multiplanar images to be used by the treating physician to assist in planning, targeting, and intraprocedural decision-making regarding adequacy of ablation coverage. After each ablation activation, the treating physician determines registration accuracy and decides whether any additional ablation is required, based on images of the software estimation of what tissues have and have not been treated.
Study summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the intraoperative use of a computer guidance software can improve the success of liver tumor ablation in adults. The employed software calculates and displays a simulation of the ablation such that the physician can visualize what portion of the target tumor has, and has not been treated at any point during the procedure. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1) Does the use of the computer guidance software reduce the number of times a tumor is incompletely treated. 2) Does the use of the computer guidance software reduce the rate of local tumor recurrence at 2 year follow-up? 3) Was there an increase or a decrease in medical problems for participants after a procedure where the guidance software was used?
Researchers will compare liver tumor treatment using the computer guidance software with an historic control to see if the addition of the guidance software improved the outcomes after an ablation.
Participants will:
Undergo CT-guided microwave ablation treatment of a liver tumor using computer-assisted simulation. Visit the clinic at one month and then every 3 months for blood tests and a contrast-enhanced CT or MRI imaging study (as per standard of care)
Eligibility
Sex
ALL
Min age
18 Years
Max age
90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Age ≥ 18 years, with life expectancy of at least 1 year
2. Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) confirmed by:
* LI-RADS 5 imaging features or
* Histopathology
* Cirrhosis with AFP \> 400
3. Localized disease without macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis, eligible for curative-intent percutaneous thermal ablation, defined as:
o Up to 5 lesions with at least one lesion, 2 -5 cm, and no lesion \>5 cm diameter
4. Tumor location deemed technically feasible for percutaneous ablation by the treating interventional radiologist
5. ECOG Performance Status 0-2
6. Adequate coagulation status, defined as:
* Platelets ≥ 50,000/μL
* INR ≤ 1.8 (or correctable)
7. Ability to undergo contrast-enhanced CT or MRI
8. Willingness and ability to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Prior local therapy to the target lesion (ablation, TACE, SBRT, or resection) or to a lesion within 1 cm of the target lesion
2. More than 5 hepatic lesions, or any lesion ineligible for technically complete ablation
3. uncontrolled hepatic decompensation, including:
o Persistent encephalopathy
4. Uncorrectable coagulopathy or contraindication to percutaneous liver intervention
5. Contraindication to contrast-enhanced imaging (e.g., severe CKD without dialysis, contrast allergy not correctable with premedication)
6. Active systemic infection
7. Pregnancy
8. Inability to comply with follow-up imaging schedule
Primary outcome measure(s)
Local Tumor Progression — Assessed at each imaging follow-up visit ( at every 3 months, up to 24 months). Local Tumor Progression (LTP) is defined as the appearance of new or enlarging nodular or irregular arterial phase enhancement with washout at or within the edge of a previously ablated lesion after an earlier imaging study has demonstrated complete ablation (technical effectiveness). LTP is determined on serial contrast-enhanced CT or MRI according to LI-RADS treatment response criteria or equivalent institutional standards.
Technical Effectiveness — 1 month post-procedure Technical Effectiveness is defined as complete ablation of all target tumor tissue, demonstrated by the absence of any nodular or irregular arterial phase enhancement within or along the margin of the ablation zone on the first post-ablation contrast-enhanced imaging study (CT or MRI). This assessment is performed approximately one month after the procedure. Imaging is interpreted according to LI-RADS treatment response criteria (LR-TR) or equivalent institutional criteria.
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
We use cookies to analyse site traffic and improve your experience. With your consent, we may also use cookies for advertising. You can change your choice at any time on our Cookie Policy page. See also our Privacy Policy.