An observational, prospective multi-regional post-market registry collecting mid- and long-term data to assess outcomes through ten years of follow-up for subjects treated with GORE® TAG® Conformable Thoracic Stent Graft with ACTIVE CONTROL System as a part of routine clinical practice. This post-market registry for the GORE® TAG® Conformable Thoracic Stent Graft with ACTIVE CONTROL System (CTAG w/AC) is intended to demonstrate that thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for lesions of the descending thoracic aorta continues to be a suitable treatment option for appropriately selected patients.
Eligibility
Sex
ALL
Min age
18 Years
Max age
—
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Patient or legally authorized representative (LAR) provides written authorization and/or consent per institution and geographical requirements.
2. Patient has been or is intended to be treated with an eligible registry device.\*
3. Patient is age ≥ 18 years at time of informed consent signature.
* The intent to treat a patient with a Gore product must be made prior to soliciting for possible registry participation. If pre-procedure consent is not feasible due to emergent situation, consent prior to the time of discharge for the index procedure is acceptable.
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Patient who is, at the time of consent, unlikely to be available for standard of care (SOC) follow-up visits as defined by the site's guidelines and procedures.
2. Patient with exclusion criteria required by local law.
3. Patient is currently enrolled in or plans to enroll in any concurrent investigational drug and/or investigational device study\* within 12 months of Together Registry enrollment. Subjects cannot be enrolled in another Together Registry module protocol.
* The term "study" does not apply to other observational registries or quality improvement projects. Collection of Registry Device performance from interventional studies may be permissible provided device application is not investigational and there are no novel requirements that alter follow-up conduct (i.e., protocol-mandated interventions).
Primary outcome measure(s)
Deployment Technical Success — Index Procedure * Successful access, delivery, and accurate deployment of the device to the intended location, and retrieval of the delivery system.
* The absence of any additional corrective procedure related to the device, procedure, or withdrawal of the delivery system. Events will not include interventions at the access site(s), lumbar drains to address spinal cord ischemia, or additional interventions to address non-treatment areas.
Lesion-related Mortality — From time of index procedure through 10 years of follow-up Death meeting at least one of the following characteristics:
* Death within 30 days of the index procedure or following conversion to open repair.
* Death within 30 days following a complication from a secondary procedure associated with the index lesion or registry device.
* Any death where the treated disease / index lesion or registry device caused or significantly contributed to the death, including lesion-rupture, aortic-related complications, disease progression involving the index lesion.
Lesion Rupture (treated area) — Through 10 years post-procedure Rupture in the treated segment of the vessel (e.g., aorta or branch) verified with direct observation or CT / CTA scan.
Lesion Enlargement (treated area) — Through 10 years post-procedure An increase in maximum vessel (e.g., aorta or treated branch) diameter of \> 5 mm in the region encompassed by the initial lesion as compared to baseline using orthogonal (i.e., perpendicular to the centerline) measurements on CT / CTA scans.
Endoleaks — Through 10 years post-procedure Perfusion of a treated lesion via:
* Type I endoleak is defined as a sealing failure at one of the attachment zones of the graft to the vessel wall, whereby arterial flow perfuses the treated lesion via a perigraft channel:
* Type Ia: Proximal aortic attachment zone
* Type Ib: Distal aortic attachment zone
* Type Ic: Distal attachment zone for branch component
* Type II: Retrograde flow from native aortic branch arteries
* Type III endoleak: Component disconnection or fabric disruption resulting in arterial flow into the perigraft space
* Type IIIa: Attachment of aortic components (aortic-aortic)
* Type IIIb: Fabric tear or disruption
* Type IIIc: Attachment of aortic component-side-branch or side-branch-side-branch
* Type IV: Late endoleak due to flow through porous fabric
* Type V/Endotension: Aneurysm sac enlargement \> 5 mm with no imaging evidence of an endoleak
* Indeterminate: Endoleak is identified, but source cannot be ascertained
Device Migration — Through 10 years post-procedure Longitudinal movement of all or part of the device for a distance ≥ 10 mm, as confirmed by CTA scan, relative to anatomical landmarks and device positioning at the first post-operative CTA scan.
Loss of aortic / branch patency — Through 10 years post-procedure No flow or contrast detected through the implanted aortic and/or branch component (for branched devices) confirmed with imaging and/or direct observation.
Stroke (All, Serious, Non-Serious) — Through 10 years post-procedure Stroke is the acute onset of symptoms consistent with focal or multifocal Central Nervous System (CNS) injury caused by vascular blockage resulting in ischemia or vascular rupture resulting in hemorrhage, that:
* Persists for \> 24 hours or until death -or-
* Symptoms lasting \< 24 hours, with pathology or neuroimaging confirmation of CNS infarction
Paraplegia (within 30 days of index procedure) — Within 30 days of index procedure New onset spinal cord injury rendering a subject non-ambulatory within 30 days of the index procedure
Paraparesis (within 30 days of index procedure) — Within 30 days of index procedure New onset spinal cord injury causing a minor motor deficit of the lower extremities within 30 days of the index procedure
New onset renal failure (within 30 days of index procedure) — Within 30 days of index procedure New onset sustained renal failure identified within 30 days of the index procedure, combined with requiring dialysis for \> 4 weeks
Renal function deterioration — Within 30 days of index procedure New onset of a decrease in eGFR \> 30% following treatment when compared to baseline eGFR.
Device integrity events (e.g., fracture, kinking, compression) — Through 10 years post-procedure Defined as any of the following:
* Wire fractures, including stents, hooks, or barbs
* Stent kinking: Narrowing of the stent graft associated with demonstrable angulation in any of the stent components, with demonstrable flow
* Disruption/tears in the graft component of the stent graft Stent compression or invagination: Transient or permanent stent-graft collapse following complete device deployment, resulting in an overall reduction in the vessel luminal diameter
Reintervention — Through 10 years post-procedure Additional surgical or interventional procedure related to the treated disease / index lesion, the registry device, or to the treatment / procedure.
This may include surgical or interventional treatment for endoleaks, access site(s) complications, disease progression (including interventions to address issues related to non-treated area of the index lesion, such as bare stent implantation to address bowel ischemia associated with aortic dissection), spinal drains for Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) management, or conversion to open surgery.
Trial sites (37)
Facility
City
Region
Status
University of Arizona
Tucson
Arizona
Recruiting
University of Southern California
Los Angeles
California
Recruiting
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles
California
Recruiting
Leland Stanford Junior University
Stanford
California
Recruiting
MedStar Health, MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C.
District of Columbia
Not Yet Recruiting
University of Florida - Gainesville
Gainesville
Florida
Recruiting
University of South Florida
Tampa
Florida
Recruiting
Augusta University
Augusta
Georgia
Recruiting
Indiana University School of Medicine
Indianapolis
Indiana
Recruiting
University of Maryland - Baltimore
Baltimore
Maryland
Recruiting
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston
Massachusetts
Not Yet Recruiting
The Hitchcock Foundation at Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon
New Hampshire
Recruiting
Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack
New Jersey
Recruiting
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill
North Carolina
Recruiting
Duke University
Durham
North Carolina
Recruiting
University Hospitals - Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland
Ohio
Recruiting
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia
Pennsylvania
Not Yet Recruiting
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia
Pennsylvania
Not Yet Recruiting
Baylor Research Institute
Dallas
Texas
Recruiting
Columbia Medical Center of Plano
Plano
Texas
Recruiting
Intermountain Medical Center
Murray
Utah
Recruiting
Sentara Medical Group, Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
Norfolk
Virginia
Recruiting
University of Washington
Seattle
Washington
Not Yet Recruiting
University of Wisconsin
Madison
Wisconsin
Recruiting
Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen
Denmark
Recruiting
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Strasbourg
Strasbourg
France
Recruiting
Universitätsklinikum Bonn
Bonn
Germany
Recruiting
Universitatsmedizin Frankfurt
Frankfurt
Germany
Recruiting
Regensburg University Hospital
Regensburg
Germany
Recruiting
Universitatsklinikum Ulm
Ulm
Germany
Recruiting
Laiko General Hospital of Athens
Athens
Greece
Recruiting
AORN S.Anna e S. Sebastiano
Caserta
Italy
Recruiting
IRCCS Policlinico di Milano
Milan
Italy
Recruiting
King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
We use cookies to analyse site traffic and improve your experience. With your consent, we may also use cookies for advertising. You can change your choice at any time on our Cookie Policy page. See also our Privacy Policy.