Talquetamab: Talquetamab will be administered subcutaneously.
Prophylaxis A: Prophylaxis A will be administered orally.
Prophylaxis B: Prophylaxis B will be administered orally.
Prophylaxis C: Prophylaxis C will be administered orally.
Prophylaxis D: Prophylaxis D will be administered topically.
Ramantamig: Ramantamig will be administered subcutaneously.
Study summary
The purpose of this study is to identify preventive treatments that can minimize the occurrence, severity, and duration of talquetamab-related taste changes (dysgeusia), during the prophylaxis (preventive) treatment phase, to better characterize the signs or symptoms of talquetamab-related taste changes and to better characterize the signs or symptoms of ramantamig-related taste changes.
Eligibility
Sex
ALL
Min age
18 Years
Max age
—
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion Criteria:
* Multiple myeloma (MM) according to IMWG diagnostic criteria
* Were triple-class exposed (received prior treatment with a PI, an IMiD, and anti CD38 mAb)
* Documented evidence of progressive disease based on investigator's determination of response by IMWG criteria on or after their last regimen
* Have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-performance status (ECOG-PS) of 0 or 1 at screening. Participants with ECOG-PS 2 or 3 are eligible for the study if the ECOG-PS score is related to stable physical limitations (e.g., wheelchair-bound due to prior spinal cord injury) and not related to multiple myeloma or associated therapy
* Be willing and able to adhere to the lifestyle restrictions specified in the protocol
Exclusion Criteria:
* Contraindications or life-threatening known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to any study drug or its excipients
* Stroke, transient ischemic attack, or seizure within 6 months prior to screening
* Any of the following within 6 months prior to the first dose of study treatment: severe or unstable angina, myocardial infarction; major thromboembolytic event (e.g., pulmonary embolism, cerebrovascular accident), clinically significant ventricular arrythmia or heart failure New York Heart Association functional classification Class III or IV. Uncomplicated deep vein thrombosis is not considered exclusionary
* Major surgery or had significant traumatic injury within 2 weeks prior to the start of administration of study treatment, or will not have fully recovered from surgery, or has major surgery planned during the time the participant is expected to be treated in the study or within 2 weeks after administration of the last dose of study treatment
* A WETT score indicating severe dysgeusia at screening and confirmed prior to randomization. Also unresolved/severe dysgeusia referred by the participant or a finding in the physical examination/oral cavity inspection. Some examples include leukoplakia, prior mouth cancers, extensive dental caries, severe periodontitis, active oral infections, candidiasis, parotic gland removal, or radiotherapy with resultant xerostomia
Primary outcome measure(s)
Percentage of Participants With Occurrence of Dysgeusia as Assessed by the Total Waterless Empirical Taste Test (WETT) Testing Score During the Prophylaxis Treatment Phase — Up to 12 months Dysgeusia is defined as total WETT score of 25th percentile or below according to the Normative WETT-SA53 percentile table. Taste assessment will be performed using taste strips (WETT). Four concentrations (4=lowest concentration, 1=highest concentration) will be used for each taste quality: sweet, sour, salty, bitter, and umami. Each test kit contains 53 taste strips distributed in 4 packs; and each taste strip is numbered (1 through 53). Participants will use each strip sequentially and record the flavor on a score card provided. The test will result in a maximum (that is, best) total score of 53. The score will be graded by a qualified site staff into a normative percentile score using a provided chart.
Percentage of Participants With Occurrence of Severe Dysgeusia During the Prophylaxis Treatment Phase — Up to 12 months Severe Dysgeusia is defined as a total WETT score of 10th percentile or below according to the normative WETT-SA53 percentile table. Taste assessment will be performed using taste strips (WETT). Four concentrations (4=lowest concentration, 1=highest concentration) will be used for each taste quality: sweet, sour, salty, bitter, and umami. Each test kit contains 53 taste strips distributed in 4 packs; and each taste strip is numbered (1 through 53). Participants will use each strip sequentially and record the flavor on a score card provided. The test will result in a maximum (that is, best) total score of 53. The score will be graded by a qualified site staff into a normative percentile score using a provided chart.
Time to the First Onset of Severe Dysgeusia During the Prophylaxis Treatment Phase — Up to 12 months Time to the first onset of severe dysgeusia is defined as time from the first dose date of talquetamab to the first onset date of severe dysgeusia according to the total WETT score. For participants without severe dysgeusia, time to the first onset will be censored. Taste assessment will be performed using taste strips (WETT). Four concentrations (4=lowest concentration, 1=highest concentration) will be used for each taste quality: sweet, sour, salty, bitter, and umami. Each test kit contains 53 taste strips distributed in 4 packs; and each taste strip is numbered (1 through 53). Participants will use each strip sequentially and record the flavor on a score card provided. The test will result in a maximum (that is, best) total score of 53. The score will be graded by a qualified site staff into a normative percentile score using a provided chart.
Percentage of Participants Who Report Resolution/Improvement of Dysgeusia During the Prophylaxis Treatment Phase — End of Month 3 Resolution/improvement is defined as 2 potential scenarios: 1) A dysgeusia downgraded to dysgeusia-free, that is (i.e.,) total WETT score of 25th percentile or below at visits prior to the end of month 3 becomes total WETT score above 25th percentile at the end of month 3. 2) Severe dysgeusia downgraded to non-severe dysgeusia, i.e., total WETT score of 10th percentile or below prior to the end of month 3 becomes total WETT score above 10th percentile at the end of month 3. Taste assessment will be performed using taste strips (WETT). Four concentrations will be used for each taste quality: sweet, sour, salty, bitter, \& umami. Each test kit contains 53 taste strips; numbered (1 through 53). Participants will use each strip sequentially and record flavor on score card provided. Test will result in maximum (i.e., best) total score of 53. Score will be graded by qualified staff into normative percentile score using provided chart.
Percentage of Participants Who Report Resolution/Improvement of Dysgeusia During the Prophylaxis Treatment Phase — End of Month 7 Resolution/improvement is defined as 2 potential scenarios: 1) A dysgeusia downgraded to dysgeusia-free, that is (i.e.,) total WETT score of 25th percentile or below at visits prior to the end of month 7 becomes total WETT score above 25th percentile at the end of month 7. 2) Severe dysgeusia downgraded to non-severe dysgeusia, i.e., total WETT score of 10th percentile or below prior to the end of month 7 becomes total WETT score above 10th percentile at the end of month 7. Taste assessment will be performed using taste strips (WETT). Four concentrations will be used for each taste quality: sweet, sour, salty, bitter, \& umami. Each test kit contains 53 taste strips; numbered (1 through 53). Participants will use each strip sequentially and record flavor on score card provided. Test will result in maximum (i.e., best) total score of 53. Score will be graded by qualified staff into normative percentile score using provided chart.
Trial sites (38)
Facility
City
Region
Status
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco
California
Recruiting
Colorado Blood Cancer Institute
Denver
Colorado
Recruiting
Yale University School Of Medicine
New Haven
Connecticut
Recruiting
Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai
New York
New York
Recruiting
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester
New York
Recruiting
Duke University Medical Center
Durham
North Carolina
Recruiting
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland
Ohio
Recruiting
Virginia Commonwealth University - Massey Cancer Center
Richmond
Virginia
Recruiting
University of Washington
Seattle
Washington
Recruiting
IDOR - Regional Brasilia
Brasília
Brazil
Recruiting
Fundacao Universidade de Caxias do Sul
Caxias do Sul
Brazil
Recruiting
Hospital Erasto Gaertner- Liga Paranaense de Combate ao Cancer
Curitiba
Brazil
Recruiting
IDOR - Regional Bahia
Salvador
Brazil
Recruiting
IDOR - Regional Sao Paulo
São Paulo
Brazil
Recruiting
Clinica Medica Sao Germano LTDA
São Paulo
Brazil
Recruiting
VUMC Amsterdam
Amsterdam
Netherlands
Recruiting
Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis
Dordrecht
Netherlands
Recruiting
Erasmus MC
Rotterdam
Netherlands
Recruiting
Hospital Espanol Auxilio Mutuo Auxilio Mutuo Cancer Center
San Juan
Puerto Rico
Recruiting
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul
South Korea
Recruiting
The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St Mary s Hospital
Seoul
South Korea
Recruiting
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul
South Korea
Recruiting
Hosp. Univ. Germans Trias I Pujol
Badalona
Spain
Recruiting
Hosp Clinic de Barcelona
Barcelona
Spain
Recruiting
Hosp. Univ. Virgen de La Arrixaca
El Palmar
Spain
Recruiting
Hosp. de Jerez de La Frontera
Jerez de la Frontera
Spain
Recruiting
Hosp. Univ. Ramon Y Cajal
Madrid
Spain
Recruiting
Hosp. Univ. 12 de Octubre
Madrid
Spain
Recruiting
Hosp. Quiron Madrid Pozuelo
Pozuelo de Alarcón
Spain
Recruiting
Hosp Clinico Univ de Salamanca
Salamanca
Spain
Recruiting
Belfast City Hospital
Belfast
United Kingdom
Recruiting
Colchester Hospital University NHS
Colchester
United Kingdom
Recruiting
Eastbourne District General Hospital
Eastbourne
United Kingdom
Recruiting
The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre
Liverpool
United Kingdom
Recruiting
University College London Hospitals
London
United Kingdom
Recruiting
Hammersmith Hospital
London
United Kingdom
Recruiting
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust Christie Hospital
Manchester
United Kingdom
Recruiting
Newcastle Freeman Hospital
Newcastle upon Tyne
United Kingdom
Completed
More Janssen Research & Development, LLC trials in the UK
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
We use cookies to analyse site traffic and improve your experience. With your consent, we may also use cookies for advertising. You can change your choice at any time on our Cookie Policy page. See also our Privacy Policy.