A Phase III Randomised Study to Evaluate Dato-DXd and Durvalumab for Neoadjuvant/Adjuvant Treatment of Triple-Negative or Hormone Receptor-low/HER2-negative Breast Cancer
Doxorubicin: IV infusion Experimental/Active Comparator
Epirubicin: IV Infusion Experimental/Active Comparator
Cyclophosphamide: IV infusion Experimental/Active Comparator
Paclitaxel: IV infusion Experimental/Active Comparator
Carboplatin: IV infusion Experimental/Active Comparator
Capecitabine: Tablet Oral route of administration Experimental/Active Comparator
Olaparib: Tablet Oral route of administration Experimental/Active Comparator
Study summary
This is a Phase III, 2-arm, randomised, open-label, multicentre, global study assessing the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant Dato-DXd plus durvalumab followed by adjuvant durvalumab with or without chemotherapy compared with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy in participants with previously untreated TNBC or hormone receptor-low/HER2-negative breast cancer.
Eligibility
Sex
ALL
Min age
18 Years
Max age
—
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion Criteria:
* Participant must be ≥ 18 years, at the time of signing the ICF.
* Histologically confirmed Stage II or III unilateral or bilateral primary invasive TNBC or hormone receptor-low/HER2-negative breast cancer
* ECOG PS of 0 or 1
* Provision of acceptable tumor sample
* Adequate bone marrow reserve and organ function
* Contraceptive use by males or females should be consistent with local regulations regarding the methods of contraception for those participating in clinical studies and aligned with protocol requirements.
Exclusion criteria:
* History of any prior invasive breast malignancy
* History of another primary malignancy except for malignancy treated with curative intent with no known active disease within 5 years before randomization.
* active or prior documented autoimmune or inflammatory disorders.
* Evidence of distant disease.
* Clinically significant corneal disease.
* Has active or uncontrolled hepatitis B or C virus infection.
* Known HIV infection that is not well controlled.
* Uncontrolled infection requiring i.v. antibiotics, antivirals or antifungals; suspected infections; or inability to rule out infections.
* Known to have active tuberculosis infection
* Mean resting corrected QTcF interval \> 470 ms obtained from ECG
* Uncontrolled or significant cardiac disease.
* History of non-infectious ILD/pneumonitis
* Has severe pulmonary function compromise
* Any prior or concurrent surgery, radiotherapy or systemic anticancer therapy for TNBC or hormone receptor-low/HER2-negative breast cancer
* For females only: is pregnant (confirmed with positive serum pregnancy test) or breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant.
* Female participants should refrain from breastfeeding from enrolment throughout the study and for at least 7 months after last dose of study intervention, or as dictated by local PI for SoC if longer.
* Concurrent use of systemic hormone replacement therapy or oral hormonal contraception
Primary outcome measure(s)
Event-free survival (EFS) in the experimental vs control arms — Date of randomization to date of the EFS event, up to 93 months after the first subject randomized EFS is defined as the time from the date of randomisation until the date of the first occurrence of any of the following events: disease progression precluding surgery, disease recurrence (local, regional, distant, or contralateral), second primary invasive cancer (other than squamous or basal cell skin cancer), or relapse from prior malignancy, or death by any cause (in the absence of recurrence). Non-invasive breast cancers and positive margins in the surgical sample do not count as an event for EFS. EFS will be determined by the investigator based on all available clinical assessments.
The analysis will include all randomised participants, as randomised, regardless of whether the participant withdraws from randomised therapy or receives another anticancer therapy.
The measure of interest will be the Hazard Ratio of EFS.
Trial sites (283)
Facility
City
Region
Status
Research Site
Daphne
Alabama
Research Site
Prescott
Arizona
Research Site
Jonesboro
Arkansas
Research Site
Rogers
Arkansas
Research Site
Los Angeles
California
Research Site
Santa Barbara
California
Research Site
Santa Rosa
California
Research Site
Torrance
California
Research Site
Aurora
Colorado
Research Site
Longmont
Colorado
Research Site
Bridgeport
Connecticut
Research Site
New Haven
Connecticut
Research Site
Fort Myers
Florida
Research Site
Jacksonville
Florida
Research Site
St. Petersburg
Florida
Research Site
West Palm Beach
Florida
Research Site
Atlanta
Georgia
Research Site
Des Moines
Iowa
Research Site
Edgewood
Kentucky
Research Site
Louisville
Kentucky
Research Site
Baton Rouge
Louisiana
Research Site
Annapolis
Maryland
Research Site
Boston
Massachusetts
Research Site
Grand Rapids
Michigan
Research Site
Traverse City
Michigan
Research Site
Burnsville
Minnesota
Research Site
Minneapolis
Minnesota
Research Site
Columbia
Missouri
Research Site
Omaha
Nebraska
Research Site
East Brunswick
New Jersey
Research Site
New Brunswick
New Jersey
Research Site
Santa Fe
New Mexico
Research Site
New York
New York
Research Site
Charlotte
North Carolina
Research Site
Durham
North Carolina
Research Site
Winston-Salem
North Carolina
Research Site
Blue Ash
Ohio
Research Site
Eugene
Oregon
Research Site
Portland
Oregon
Research Site
Philadelphia
Pennsylvania
+ 243 more sites — see the full list on the official registry below.
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
We use cookies to analyse site traffic and improve your experience. With your consent, we may also use cookies for advertising. You can change your choice at any time on our Cookie Policy page. See also our Privacy Policy.