🇮🇪Ireland
16°C Partly Cloudy · Dublin
Live Updates
--:--:-- IST
Writer Login
Latest
Clinical Trials in the UK / NCT02922036
Active, not recruiting Not applicable

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Previously Untreatable and High Risk Upgrade Patients

NCT02922036 · tracked via the Priya Life Science UK tracker
Sponsor
EBR Systems, Inc.
Phase
Not applicable
Started
2018-01-17
Last updated
2025-07-09

Condition(s) studied

Heart Failure

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

WiSE System

WiSE System: The WiSE System is an implantable cardiac system to provide LV pacing stimulation in conjunction with a co-implanted system that provides right ventricular stimulation.

Study summary

This study is a prospective, multi-center, pivotal trial to study the safety and efficacy of the WiSE-CRT System for Cardiac Re-synchronization Therapy.

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Min age
18 Years
Max age
Healthy volunteers
Accepted
Inclusion/Exclusion: Inclusion Criteria 1. Patient with a class I or IIa (1) or (2) indication for implantation of a CRT-D device according to current available guidelines (with additional QRS criteria on Class IIa (1)): 1. Class I: NYHA II, III, IV, EF ≤ 35%, LBBB, QRS ≥ 150ms 2. Class IIa (1): NYHA II, III, IV, EF≤ 35%, LBBB, QRS ≥ 130 to \< 150ms 3. Class IIa (2): NYHA II, III, IV, EF≤ 35%, non-LBBB, QRS ≥ 150ms 2. Patient is a: 1. 'Non-responder' \[Not Enrolling\]: Patients who have a CRT system that is functional and despite an adequate trial of Guideline Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) and attempts at optimal device programming the patient has not responded to therapy for a minimum of 6 months. Non-response is defined as: * EF has remained unchanged or worsened (defined as \< 5% increase since implant), and * The patient's clinical status based in the totality of available clinical evidence (such as NYHA Class, exercise tolerance, QOL, or global assessment) has remained unchanged or worsened, as determined by the local Site Enrollment Committee OR 2. 'Previously Untreatable': Patients who have a full or partial CRT system, who meet general inclusion criteria and are deemed as 'previously untreatable' for one of the following reasons: i. Patients in whom CS lead implantation for CRT has failed * CS lead implant was attempted but abandoned due any of the following: difficult CS access or anatomy, inadequate lead location, inadequate pacing thresholds, persistent phrenic nerve pacing, or other procedural challenges ii. CS lead implanted but has been programmed OFF * LV lead that was implanted but not operational includes patients in whom the LV lead is inoperative or programmed off due to improper function such as high threshold, non-capture, phrenic nerve pacing, lead failure, lead dislodgement, or sub-optimal LV lead location OR c. 'High Risk Upgrade: Patients who have a relative contraindication to CS lead implant, due to: * venous occlusion or lesion precluding implant * pocket infection risk (at co-implanted device site) * considered high risk for CS implant due to co-morbidities 3. Patients on a stable Guideline Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) 4. Patient must be 18 years old or over 5. Patient has signed and dated informed consent 6. Patient has suitable anatomy for implant of the WiSE CRT System (e.g. adequate acoustic window, LV wall thickness in target implant area ≥ 5 mm, absence of LV wall structural abnormalities which may preclude implant) Exclusion Criteria Patients who meet any one of these criteria will be excluded from the investigation: 1. Pure RBBB 2. LVEDD ≥ 8cm 3. Non-ambulatory or unstable NYHA class IV 4. Contraindication to heparin, chronic anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents 5. Triple anticoagulant patients who cannot tolerate peri-procedural stopping of anticoagulation therapy 6. Attempted device implant (pacemaker, ICD, CRT, LV lead) or successful co-implant within prior 30 days. 7. Patients with planned or expected lithotripsy treatment post implant 8. Life expectancy of \< 12 months 9. Chronic hemodialysis 10. Stage 4 or 5 renal dysfunction defined as eGFR \< 30 11. Grade 4 mitral valve regurgitation 12. Noncardiac implanted electrical stimulation therapy devices 13. Patients with a prosthetic aortic valve in which the electrode cannot be implanted via a transseptal approach 14. Patients with a prosthetic mitral valve in which the electrode cannot be implanted via a retrograde aortic approach 15. Unstable angina, acute MI, CABG, or PTCA within the past 1 month 16. Correctable valvular disease that is the primary cause of heart failure 17. Recent CVA or TIA (within the previous 3 months) 18. Patients with a history of paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation/flutter are excluded if they have had a documented AF episode \> 30 min or a cardioversion in the past 1 month. 19. Patients with permanent AF are excluded if they have intact AV node conduction (RV pacing \<95%) 20. Already included in another clinical study that could confound the results of this study 21. Pregnancy 22. Known drug or alcohol addiction or abuse 23. Moderate or severe aortic stenosis 24. Subject unable to attend follow-up at the investigative center or unable, for physical or mental reasons, or to comply with the trial's procedures 25. For Part II Randomized patients only, those who will not tolerate being randomized to the Control Group for 6 months

Primary outcome measure(s)

Trial sites (68)

FacilityCityRegionStatus
Heart Center Research Huntsville Alabama
University of California, San Diego La Jolla California
Broward Health Medical Center Fort Lauderdale Florida
St. Vincent's Healthcare Jacksonville Florida
Watson Clinic Lakeland Florida
Naples Community Hospital Naples Florida
Northside Hospital and Heart Institute St. Petersburg Florida
Piedmont Heart Institute Atlanta Georgia
Emory Healthcare Atlanta Georgia
Prairie Heart Springfield Illinois
St. Vincent's Hospital and Healthcare Center Indianapolis Indiana
University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa
Saint Luke's Health System Kansas City Kansas City Kansas
The University of Kansas Medical Center Kansas City Kansas
Baptist Health Lexington Lexington Kentucky
Ochsner Medical Center - Baton Rouge Baton Rouge Louisiana
University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan
Michigan Heart Canton Michigan
Henry Ford Hospital Detroit Michigan
William Beaumont Hospital Hazel Park Michigan
Sparrow Hospital Lansing Michigan
Minneapolis Heart Institute Minneapolis Minnesota
Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota
United Heart and Vascular Clinic Saint Paul Minnesota
Methodist Physicians Clinic Heart Consultants Omaha Nebraska
Rutgers University New Brunswick New Jersey
AtlantiCare Regional Medical Center Pomona New Jersey
Weill Cornell Medical Center New York New York
Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio
The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio
PeaceHealth Springfield Oregon
Penn State Health, Hershey Medical Center Hershey Pennsylvania
UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
MUSC Gazes Research Institute Charleston South Carolina
Stern Cardiovascular Center Germantown Tennessee
Texas Heart Institute Houston Texas
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas
The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano Plano Texas
Houston Methodist Sugar Land Texas
Intermountain Medical Center Murray Utah

+ 28 more sites — see the full list on the official registry below.

Other trials for the same condition

Official registry record

This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.

View NCT02922036 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in the UK