🇮🇪Ireland
16°C Partly Cloudy · Dublin
Live Updates
--:--:-- IST
Contributor sign in
Latest
Clinical Trials in Turkey / NCT07156487
Starting soon Not applicable

Pain and Anxiety in Pediatric Dentistry: Computer-Controlled vs. Traditional Anesthesia

NCT07156487 · tracked via the Priya Life Science Turkey tracker
Phase
Not applicable
Started
2025-10
Last updated
2025-09-05

Condition(s) studied

Traditional Local AnesthesiaComputer-controlled Electronic AnesthesiaDental AnxietyAnxiety in Children

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

Digital Anesthesia with SleeperOne 5Infiltration Anesthesia with a Metal Cartridge SyringeMandibular Block Anesthesia with a Metal Cartridge Syringe

Digital Anesthesia with SleeperOne 5: For both maxillary and mandibular teeth, 1.7 mL of Ultracaine D-S Fort carpule (4% articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine) was administered in two stages (gingival and intraosseous injection) using a computer-controlled intraosseous anesthesia system with a 30-gauge, 9 mm Effitec needle.

Infiltration Anesthesia with a Metal Cartridge Syringe: For maxillary teeth, buccal infiltration is performed using a metal carpule syringe and a 30G, 16 mm Effitec needle (Dental Hi Tec, France); after aspiration, Ultracaine D-S Fort is slowly injected over 1 minute.

Mandibular Block Anesthesia with a Metal Cartridge Syringe: For mandibular teeth, the injection site is dried, and a 27G, 35 mm Effitec needle (Dental Hi Tec, France) is inserted between the pterygomandibular raphe and internal oblique ridge, aligned with contralateral molars. After aspiration, Ultracaine D-S Fort is slowly injected over 1 minute using a traditional metal carpule syringe, following the standard mandibular block technique.

Study summary

The purpose of this clinical study is to evaluate how different local anesthesia techniques affect pain and anxiety levels in children undergoing dental treatment. Specifically, the study compares traditional syringe-based anesthesia with a computer-controlled local anesthesia system.

The study seeks to answer the following question: Which combination of anesthesia technique is most effective in reducing pain and anxiety in pediatric dental patients?

By understanding the impact of these variables, the study aims to help dental professionals choose the most appropriate anesthesia approach to improve the comfort and emotional well-being of children during dental procedures.

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Min age
7 Years
Max age
10 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients classified as ASA I in general systemic health * Children between 7 and 10 years of age * Absence of any syndromic condition * No physical or mental disability * No prior dental treatment experience * Frankl Behavior Rating Scale Class III or IV * Presence of carious lesions limited to less than one-third of the buccolingual distance between cusp tips on the occlusal surfaces of primary or permanent molars on both sides * Radiographic evidence of caries involving up to half of the dentin thickness with intact dentin at the pulp-dentin border in primary or permanent molars on both sides * Teeth on both sides responding positively to pulp vitality tests, with no periradicular pathology or significant widening of the lamina dura on periapical radiographs Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with mild or severe systemic diseases or those undergoing medical treatment * Patients younger than 7 or older than 10 years of age * Uncooperative or noncompliant patients classified as Class I or Class II according to the Frankl Behavior Rating Scale * Patients requiring urgent dental treatment * Patients with wide carious lesions extending beyond one-third of the buccolingual distance between cusp tips on the occlusal surfaces * Patients with carious lesions limited to less than one-third of the buccolingual width only on one side of the jaw * Teeth with carious lesions not reaching half of the dentin thickness on radiographic evaluation or lacking intact dentin at the pulp border * Teeth that do not respond positively to pulp vitality tests, or that show periradicular lesions or marked widening of the lamina dura on periapical radiographs

Primary outcome measure(s)

Trial sites (1)

FacilityCityRegionStatus
Dicle University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry Diyarbakır Turkey (Türkiye)

More Dicle University trials in Turkey

Other trials for the same condition

Official registry record

This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.

View NCT07156487 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Turkey