🇮🇪Ireland
16°C Partly Cloudy · Dublin
Live Updates
--:--:-- IST
Writer Login
Latest
Clinical Trials in Turkey / NCT07057908
Starting soon Observational

Comparison of Intubation Using Video Laryngeal Mask and Video Laryngoscope in Elective Surgical Patients

NCT07057908 · tracked via the Priya Life Science Turkey tracker
Phase
Observational
Started
2025-09-01
Last updated
2025-09-05

Condition(s) studied

Airway ManagementTracheal IntubationElective SurgeriesVideolaryngoscopyAnaesthesia

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

Video Laryngoscope Intubation with BougieVideo Laryngeal Mask Airway (SaCoVLM) Intubation with Bougie

Video Laryngoscope Intubation with Bougie: Participants in this group will undergo tracheal intubation using a video laryngoscope under general anesthesia. After induction, a standard bougie will be advanced through the vocal cords under video guidance, and the endotracheal tube will be railroaded over the bougie into the trachea. The primary outcome will be intubation time, measured from insertion of the device until confirmation of successful tracheal intubation. Additional parameters such as intubation success rate, ease of insertion, and complications (e.g., desaturation, airway trauma, failed attempts) will also be recorded. No extra procedures will be performed beyond routine airway management.

Video Laryngeal Mask Airway (SaCoVLM) Intubation with Bougie: Participants in this group will undergo tracheal intubation using a video laryngeal mask airway (SaCoVLM) under general anesthesia. After successful placement of the device, a standard bougie will be inserted through the SaCoVLM's dedicated lumen, and an endotracheal tube will be advanced over the bougie into the trachea under video guidance. The primary outcome will be intubation time, defined as the duration from device insertion to confirmation of successful intubation. Secondary outcomes include intubation success rate, ease of insertion, and complications such as desaturation, trauma, or failed attempts. As both techniques are part of routine practice, no additional risks will be introduced.

Study summary

This study compares two airway devices that are commonly used during elective surgery: the video laryngeal mask airway (VLM) and the video laryngoscope (VLS). Both are part of routine anesthesia practice. Our main focus is to measure how long intubation takes with each device and to see how successful the intubation is. The study does not involve any extra procedures or risks; everything will be carried out as part of normal patient care.

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Min age
18 Years
Max age
—
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion Criteria: * Adult patients aged 18 years and older * Patients scheduled for elective surgical procedures * Patients classified as ASA Physical Status I-III * Patients undergoing general anesthesia Exclusion Criteria: * Patients younger than 18 years * Patients undergoing emergency surgery * Patients with difficult airway predictors, such as: Mallampati score ≥ 3 Thyromental distance \< 6 cm Mouth opening \< 3 cm * Patients with anatomical abnormalities or surgical history involving the oropharynx, larynx, or airway * Patients with conditions contraindicating head or neck manipulation (e.g., cervical instability, upper airway tumors) Pregnant patients

Primary outcome measure(s)

Trial sites (1)

FacilityCityRegionStatus
Samsun University, Samsun Training and Research Hospital Samsun Ilkadim

More Samsun University trials in Turkey

Other trials for the same condition

Official registry record

This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.

View NCT07057908 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in Turkey