A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease

Condition(s) studied

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

Guselkumab Dose 1: Guselkumab will be administered by IV infusion.

Guselkumab Dose 2: Guselkumab will be administered by SC injection.

Guselkumab Dose 3: Guselkumab will be administered by IV infusion.

Guselkumab Dose 4: Guselkumab will be administered by IV infusion.

Guselkumab Dose 5: Guselkumab will be by SC injection.

Guselkumab: Guselkumab will be administered by IV infusion and SC injection.

Ustekinumab: Ustekinumab will be administered by IV infusion and SC injection.

Placebo: Placebo will be administered as IV infusion.

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy (GALAXI 1), clinical and endoscopic efficacy (GALAXI 2 and GALAXI 3) and safety of guselkumab in participants with Crohn's disease.

Eligibility

Primary outcome measure(s)

• GALAXI 1: Change From Baseline in the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score at Week 12 — Baseline and Week 12
  The multi-item CDAI score assessed severity of illness by collecting information on 8 different Crohn's disease-related variables (extraintestinal manifestations, abdominal mass, weight, hematocrit, use of antidiarrheal drug(s) and/or opiates, total number of liquid or very soft stools, abdominal pain/cramps, and general well-being). The last 3 variables were scored over 7 eligible days by the participant on a diary card. The total CDAI score ranged from 0 to 600 in general: higher score indicated higher disease activities. A decrease in total CDAI score over time indicates improvement in disease activity. Baseline was defined as the last observation prior to or at the date of the first study intervention.
• Global: GALAXI 2: Percentage of Participants With Both Clinical Response at Week 12 and Clinical Remission at Week 48 — Weeks 48
  Clinical response was defined as a decrease from baseline (BL) in CDAI score greater than or equal to (\>=) 100 points or CDAI score \<150. Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score \<150. The multi-item CDAI score assessed severity of illness by collecting information on 8 different Crohn's disease-related variables (extraintestinal manifestations, abdominal mass, weight, hematocrit, use of antidiarrheal drug(s) and/or opiates, total number of liquid or very soft stools, abdominal pain/cramps, and general well-being). The last 3 variables were scored over 7 eligible days by the participant on a diary card. The total CDAI score ranged from 0 to 600 in general: higher score indicated higher disease activities. A decrease in total CDAI score over time indicates improvement in disease activity.
• Global: GALAXI 2: Percentage of Participants With Both Clinical Response (CR) at Week 12 and Endoscopic Response (ER) at Week 48 — Weeks 48
  CR: decrease from BL in CDAI score \>=100/\<150. ER: \>=50% improvement from BL in SES-CD score/SES-CD score \<=2. CDAI(8 variables):extraintestinal manifestations, abdominal mass, weight, hematocrit, use of antidiarrheal drug(s) and/or opiates, total number of liquid/soft stools, abdominal pain/cramps, general well-being. Last 3 variables scored over 7 eligible days by participant on diary. Total CDAI score ranged:0-600(in general):higher score=higher disease activities. Decrease in total CDAI score over time=improvement in disease. SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic components (presence \& size of ulcer, extent of ulcerated surface, extent of affected surface, presence \& type of narrowing) across 5 ileocolonic segments (ileum; right, left \& transverse colon; rectum) each scored 0(best) to 3(worst) except narrowing component for which maximum total score (that is, stricturing) was 11 points. SES-CD score: sum of all component scores(all segments) ranged:0-56, higher scores=more severe disease.
• Global: GALAXI 3: Percentage of Participants With Both Clinical Response at Week 12 and Clinical Remission at Week 48 — Weeks 48
  Clinical response was defined as a decrease from baseline in CDAI score \>= 100 points or CDAI score \<150. Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score \<150. The multi-item CDAI score assessed severity of illness by collecting information on 8 different Crohn's disease-related variables (extraintestinal manifestations, abdominal mass, weight, hematocrit, use of antidiarrheal drug(s) and/or opiates, total number of liquid or very soft stools, abdominal pain/cramps, and general well-being). The last 3 variables were scored over 7 eligible days by the participant on a diary card. The total CDAI score ranged from 0 to 600 in general: higher score indicated higher disease activities. A decrease in total CDAI score over time indicates improvement in disease activity.
• Global: GALAXI 3: Percentage of Participants With Both Clinical Response (CR) at Week 12 and Endoscopic Response (ER) at Week 48 — Weeks 48
  CR: decrease from BL in CDAI score \>=100/\<150. ER: \>=50% improvement from BL in SES-CD score/SES-CD score \<=2. CDAI(8 variables):extraintestinal manifestations, abdominal mass, weight, hematocrit, use of antidiarrheal drug(s) and/or opiates, total number of liquid/soft stools, abdominal pain/cramps, general well-being. Last 3 variables scored over 7 eligible days by participant on diary. Total CDAI score ranged:0-600(in general):higher score=higher disease activities. Decrease in total CDAI score over time=improvement in disease. SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic components (presence \& size of ulcer, extent of ulcerated surface, extent of affected surface, presence \& type of narrowing) across 5 ileocolonic segments (ileum; right, left \& transverse colon; rectum) each scored 0(best) to 3(worst) except narrowing component for which maximum total score (that is, stricturing) was 11 points. SES-CD score: sum of all component scores(all segments) ranged:0-56, higher scores=more severe disease.
• Regional: GALAXI 2: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 12 — Week 12
  Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score \<150. The multi-item CDAI score assessed severity of illness by collecting information on 8 different Crohn's disease-related variables (extraintestinal manifestations, abdominal mass, weight, hematocrit, use of antidiarrheal drug(s) and/or opiates, total number of liquid or very soft stools, abdominal pain/cramps, and general well-being). The last 3 variables were scored over 7 eligible days by the participant on a diary card. The total CDAI score ranged from 0 to 600 in general: higher score indicated higher disease activities. A decrease in total CDAI score over time indicates improvement in disease activity.
• Regional: GALAXI 2: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Response at Week 12 — Week 12
  Endoscopic response was defined as \>=50% improvement from baseline in SES-CD score or SES-CD score \<=2. SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic components (presence and size of ulcer, extent of ulcerated surface, extent of affected surface, presence and type of narrowing) across 5 ileocolonic segments (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum), each scored 0 (best) to 3 (worst) except narrowing component for which maximum total score (that is, stricturing) was 11 points. Total SES-CD score: sum of all component scores across all segments, ranged: 0 to 56, higher scores = more severe disease.
• Regional: GALAXI 3: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 12 — Week 12
  Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score \<150. The multi-item CDAI score assessed severity of illness by collecting information on 8 different Crohn's disease-related variables (extraintestinal manifestations, abdominal mass, weight, hematocrit, use of antidiarrheal drug(s) and/or opiates, total number of liquid or very soft stools, abdominal pain/cramps, and general well-being). The last 3 variables were scored over 7 eligible days by the participant on a diary card. The total CDAI score ranged from 0 to 600 in general: higher score indicated higher disease activities. A decrease in total CDAI score over time indicates improvement in disease activity.
• Regional: GALAXI 3: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Response at Week 12 — Week 12
  Endoscopic response was defined as \>=50% improvement from baseline in SES-CD score or SES-CD score \<=2. SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic components (presence and size of ulcer, extent of ulcerated surface, extent of affected surface, presence and type of narrowing) across 5 ileocolonic segments (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, rectum), each scored 0 (best) to 3 (worst) except narrowing component for which maximum total score (that is, stricturing) was 11 points. Total SES-CD score: sum of all component scores across all segments, ranged: 0 to 56, higher scores = more severe disease.

Trial sites (579)

+ 539 more sites — see the full list on the official registry below.

On this site

More Janssen Research & Development, LLC trials in India

Other trials for the same condition