CCTA-Based vs CAG-Based CABG: A Multicenter Pragmatic Non-Inferiority Trial

Condition(s) studied

Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)

CCTA-based CABG: Surgical planning based solely on CCTA-derived data, including diameter stenosis (DS), area stenosis (AS), CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR), LV:RV perfusion index, plaque characterization, 3D reconstruction of target vessels, and collateral circulation of chronic total occlusions (CTO) and so on. CCTA performed using photon-counting CT or conventional CT (≥64-slice, preferably ≥256-slice), following a standardized acquisition protocol. Images are transferred to an independent core laboratory for quantitative analysis and standardized reporting. The operating surgeon will not have access to CAG.

CAG-based CABG: Surgical planning following standard practice using invasive coronary angiography(CAG). Angiograms obtained using a flat-panel detector system with standardized projections. The results of CAG are interpreted by the operating surgeon.The operating surgeon will not have access to CCTA.

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to find out if using a non-invasive heart scan (called coronary computed tomography angiography, or CCTA) to plan coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) works as well as the standard invasive approach (called coronary angiography, or CAG) for people with blocked heart arteries.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Do people who have surgery planned with the non-invasive heart scan have similar health outcomes at 1 year as those who have surgery planned with the standard invasive approach? How does the non-invasive approach compare in terms of heart attacks, strokes, unplanned repeat procedures, and longer hospital stays? Researchers will compare two groups of participants. One group will have their surgery planned using only the CCTA . The other group will have their surgery planned using only the CAG. Both groups will undergo the CABG per local protocol.

Participants will:

Be randomly assigned (like flipping a coin) to one of the two planning approaches Undergo CABG as scheduled Return for follow-up visits at sugery days, 7 days, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery Have a follow-up CCTA scan at 7 days and 1 year to check if the new bypass grafts are working well

Eligibility

Primary outcome measure(s)

• 1-year incidence of 5-Point Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (5P-MACE) — Within 1 year post-CABG
  The 5P-MACE was defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, unplanned revascularization, and CABG-related or cardiovascular-related prolonged postoperative length of stay (PLOS) or rehospitalization.

Trial sites (1)

More Ruijin Hospital trials in China

Other trials for the same condition