Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Phase
Not applicable
Started
2025-08-24
Last updated
2026-09-08
Condition(s) studied
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)
Home-based digital therapy with brain-controlled games
Home-based digital therapy with brain-controlled games: Home-based brain-controlled training for children with ADHD is completed in a home environment. The training session lasts for 30 minutes daily, with a total of 30 sessions to be completed within a 2-month period. All training frequency and duration are presented in a quantifiable format.
The training process incorporates engaging game elements. AI technology is used to provide real-time monitoring and difficulty adjustments, ensuring that each child's training intensity and content are personalized and optimized based on their individual needs.
Eye-tracking technology is integrated into the game training to further enhance the training effects on visual attention and cognitive control, making the training more comprehensive and multi-faceted.
Study summary
Explore the interventional effects of neurofeedback games on school-aged children with mild to moderate ADHD, with the aim of providing evidence-based new methods for intervening in the core symptoms of ADHD in children.
Eligibility
Sex
ALL
Min age
7 Years
Max age
11 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion Criteria:
* Children aged 7 years 0 months to 11 years 11 months
* Clinical diagnosis of ADHD made by a child psychiatrist at the attending level or above
* Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) Full Scale IQ (FSIQ) above 85
* Children who have been diagnosed with ADHD but have not received any intervention (newly diagnosed within the last month or not having taken medication for at least 4 weeks)
* Informed consent must be obtained from the patient/guardian and from participants
Exclusion Criteria:
* Auditory or visual illness or disorder
* Inability to use software (e.g., color blindness, impaired hand function, or disability)
* Comorbid oppositional defiant disorder, autism spectrum disorder, pervasive developmental disorder, tic disorders, or other neurodevelopmental disorders
* Other mental illnesses such as organic mental disorders, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or depressive disorders
* Attention deficit disorder caused by organic neurological diseases or other organic diseases
* Previous regular ADHD medication use as prescribed by a doctor, but without efficacy
* Past or present gaming addiction
* Previous neurofeedback-like "brain control game" interventions
* Previous physical therapy such as magnetic stimulation.
Primary outcome measure(s)
Inattention — The first week after the intervention Assess using the Inattention subscale scores from the parent version of the Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham-IV (SNAP-IV) 47-item Rating Scale. The Inattention subscale consists of the first 9 items of the parent version of the 47-item SNAP-IV scale, directly corresponding to the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for inattentive symptoms. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale: 0 (not at all), 1 (just a little), 2 (quite a bit), and 3 (very much). The subscale score is calculated as the mean of items 1-9 (range 0-3). Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. Based on established clinical norms (Swanson, 2001), a mean score of ≥ 1.67 is defined as the threshold for a "positive" symptomatic response (clinical significance) for Inattention. Previous studies have demonstrated that this subscale possesses exceptional psychometric properties, with internal consistency (Cronbach's α) reported as high as 0.95 in recent clinical evaluations (Enemuo et al., 2022; Hall et al., 2020).
Hyperactivity-Impulsivity — The first week after the intervention Assess using the Hyperactivity-Impulsivity subscale scores from the parent version of the SNAP-IV questionnaire. The Hyperactivity-Impulsivity subscale consists of items 10-18 of the parent version of the 47-item SNAP-IV scale, corresponding to the DSM-5 criteria for hyperactive and impulsive symptoms. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale: 0 (not at all), 1 (just a little), 2 (quite a bit), and 3 (very much).The subscale score is calculated as the mean of items 10-18 (range 0-3). Higher scores reflect increased severity of hyperactivity and impulsivity. According to standardized norms, a mean score of ≥ 1.50 is used as the cut-off point to determine a "positive" symptomatic status (clinical significance) for Hyperactivity-Impulsivity. Extensive psychometric evaluations have reported exceptional reliability for this subscale, with a Cronbach's α coefficient reported as high as 0.92 to 0.94 in clinical samples (Bussing et al., 2008; Hall et al., 2020).
Trial sites (1)
Facility
City
Region
Status
Weiping Xia
Shanghai
Shanghai Municipality
Recruiting
More Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine trials in China
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
We use cookies to analyse site traffic and improve your experience. With your consent, we may also use cookies for advertising. You can change your choice at any time on our Cookie Policy page. See also our Privacy Policy.