Cesarean delivery: All patients were delivered via cesarean section with standardized perioperative management, including preoperative preparation (e.g., autologous bloodreserve, corticosteroid administration for foetal lungmaturation, etc.), surgical approach, and postoperative care.
Conservative management (intentional placental retention in situ with local resection and pelvic devascularization) was primarily employed, while peripartum hysterectomy was reserved for those with extensive invasion or failed conservative treatment.
Study summary
Current clinical practice guidelines recommend planned cesarean delivery(CD) at 34-37 weeks of gestation in pregnant women with placenta previa and accreta. Preterm birth may lead to neonatal immaturity, while laterCD may increase the risk of severe hemorrhage and surgery complications. Retrospective studies have shown that indicated CD occurs in approximately1/3 of patients before 36 weeks, with the main trigger being antepartum hemorrhage. However, the risk of antepartum hemorrhage is lower after 36 weeks. Recent study showed that delivery shifted from 34-36 weeks to 37 weeks did not increase therisk of maternal intraoperative/postoperative hemorrhage and emergency CD. To further validate this, we propose to conduct a randomized controlled study comparing the effect of planned delivery management strategies at 37 0/7-37 6/7 weeks of gestation with those at 36 0/7-36 6/7 weekson maternal and fetal outcomes. The aim of this study is to explore whether planned delivery up to 37 weeks in pregnant women with placenta previa and accreta improves neonatal outcomes without increasing maternal obstetric risks.
Eligibility
Sex
FEMALE
Min age
18 Years
Max age
45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion Criteria:
* 28-34 weeks of gestation.
* Both ultrasound and MRI indicate placenta previa with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).
* Planned to undergo cesarean delivery at the participating study hospitals.
* Agree to participate and sign the informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria:
* Multiple gestation.
* Other obstetric complications (e.g., preeclampsia, vasa previa), and severe maternal medical conditions (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, progressive cardiovascular disease, active systemic lupus erythematosus, liver cirrhosis).
* Major uterine structural anomalies (e.g., uterine didelphys, Uterine tumors ≥5 cm).
* Estimated fetal weight \<3rd percentile for gestational age, major congenital anomalies, intrauterine fetal demise.
Primary outcome measure(s)
Composite neonatal morbidity — Within 30 days after childbirth The Composite neonatal morbidity was defined as any of the following: admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), need for mechanical ventilation (MV), Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS), Transient Tachypnea of Newborn (TTN), Necrotizing Enterocolitis (Necrotizing Enterocolitis), and necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC). Syndrome (RDS), Transient Tachypnea of Newborn (TTN), Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC), Intraventricular Hemorrhage (IVH), Septicemia (S), and Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NE). IVH), sepsis (Sepsis), and neonatal death. Evaluator blinding was used to ensure the objectivity of the assessment, and the pediatrician responsible for assessing neonatal complications was unaware of the grouping information.
Intraoperative Estimated Blood Loss (EBL) — From surgery initiation to 24 hours postoperatively Intraoperative EBL was calculated during delivery using a combined gravimetric and volumetric method: all surgical gauzes and drapes were weighed before the procedure (preoperative weight), and blood-soaked gauzes and drapes were weighed postoperatively (postoperative weight); the baseline fluid volume in the suction canister was recorded before amniotic fluid aspiration, and the total volume was recorded immediately after completion of amniotic fluid aspiration (amniotic fluid volume = post-aspiration volume - baseline volume). The final EBL (ml)was calculated as: (postoperative weight - preoperative weight) + (total suctioned volume - amniotic fluid volume - irrigation fluid volume).
Trial sites (6)
Facility
City
Region
Status
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Guangzhou
Guangdong
Recruiting
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
Zhengzhou
Henan
Not Yet Recruiting
West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University
Chengdu
Sichuan
Not Yet Recruiting
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing
China
Not Yet Recruiting
The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Chongqing
China
Not Yet Recruiting
Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center
Guangzhou
China
Not Yet Recruiting
More The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University trials in China
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
We use cookies to analyse site traffic and improve your experience. With your consent, we may also use cookies for advertising. You can change your choice at any time on our Cookie Policy page. See also our Privacy Policy.