Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Condition(s) studied
Investigational drug(s) / intervention(s)
Pulsed Field Ablation: Patients will be treated with pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Radiofrequency Ablation: Patients will be treated with radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Study summary
This clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of pulsed field ablation and radiofrequency ablation to treat persistent atrial fibrillation in adults.
Participants will:
Undergo pulsed field ablation or radiofrequency ablation. Keep follow-up for at least 12 months.
Eligibility
Primary outcome measure(s)
- Freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia lasting for >30s in the absence of antiarrhythmic therapy in 12 months after the index ablation procedure (excluding a blanking period of 3 months) — From the end of the 3-month blanking period post-ablation to the 12-month follow-up
Trial sites (1)
| Facility | City | Region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University | Beijing | China |
More Beijing Anzhen Hospital trials in China
Other trials for the same condition
This page summarises publicly available registry data for informational purposes — not medical advice. Eligibility is determined by each study team; patients should discuss participation with their clinician.
View NCT06791629 on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗ ← All trials in China